http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.2485(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

---

The above paper is about a possible two-time formulation of physics. It is by serious people.

To understand it I'm trying to generalized the Dirac eqn. to 3+2 dimensions with signature (++---)

I found the following (now closed post) useful:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...f-dirac-spinor-in-arbitrary-dimensions.244296

Apparently the Dirac matrices would still be 4x4 in 5 dimensions.

Is this the case?

I also guess that there's not another linear combination that could be used to distinguish the two times, so you don't get cross terms when the you square up the Dirac eqn. to find the space-timel part of the plane wave solution.

With 4x4 matrices obeying Dirac orthogonality condition

(g_a*g_b+g_b*g-a=g_ab*delta_b=0)

Are there more than 4 independent matrices? I don't think I can use gamma_5, it already got a role.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Clifford Algebra and generalizing Dirac equaution

Tags:

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Clifford Algebra generalizing |
---|

A Equation in a paper about Dicke states |

I State Vectors vs. Wavefunctions |

A States in usual QM/QFT and in the algebraic approach |

I Dirac algebra help |

A Srednicki's normalization choice for lie algebra generators |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**