Spinors in dimensions other than 4

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Spinors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the properties and implications of spinors and gamma matrices in dimensions other than four, particularly in the context of the Dirac equation for spin-1/2 fermions. Participants explore the dimensionality of gamma matrices, the nature of spinors, and potential generalizations of the Dirac equation in higher dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the Dirac equation describes non-interacting spin-1/2 fermions and asserts that the smallest number of dimensions for gamma matrices that satisfy the Clifford algebra is four.
  • Another participant challenges this claim, stating that the smallest number of dimensions is actually two, referencing a Wikipedia article on higher-dimensional gamma matrices.
  • There is a question about the physicality of higher-dimensional spinors and whether they can be considered in the context of the Dirac equation.
  • Participants inquire about what determines the dimensions of gamma matrices and spinors, as well as the implications of generalizing the Dirac equation in higher dimensions.
  • A reference to Van Proeyen's work on supersymmetry is provided as a potential resource for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the minimum dimensionality of gamma matrices, with some asserting it is four and others claiming it is two. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of higher-dimensional spinors and the generalization of the Dirac equation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights varying interpretations of the dimensional requirements for gamma matrices and the implications for spinors, with references to external sources that may contain additional context or differing viewpoints.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The Dirac equation describes the behaviour of non-interacting spin-##1/2## fermions in a quantum-field-theoretic framework and is given by

##i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi=-m\psi,##

where ##\gamma^{\mu}## are the so-called gamma matrices which obey the Clifford algebra ##\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\}=2g^{\mu\nu}## and the spinor ##\psi## is the vector space on which the gamma matrices act. Therefore, the dimension of the gamma matrices fixes the dimension of the spinor.

The spinor ##\psi## that describes spin-##1/2## fermions in this quantum-field-theoretic framework is a ##4##-dimensional vector and the gamma matrices are ##4##-dimensional matrices.The smallest number of dimensions of the gamma matrices that satisfy the Clifford algebra is ##4##. Can we not consider higher-dimensional gamma matrices and corresponding spinors? Are these higher-dimensional spinors at all physical?

What determines the dimensions of the gamma matrices and the spinors?

What are the possible generalisations of the Dirac equation in higher dimensions? Does this involve an increase in the number of gamma matrices?
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinor#Summary_in_low_dimensions

upload_2016-10-15_17-48-20.png


Also see, http://motls.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-are-there-spinors.html

"Why are there spinors?

Spinors are competitors of vectors and tensors. In other words, they are representations of the orthogonal (rotational) group or the pseudoorthogonal (Lorentz) group, a space of possible objects whose defining property is the very characteristic behavior of their components under these transformations."
 
See e.g. Van Proeyen's Tools for Supersymmetry :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K