Cluster radioactivity - preformed cluster model

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter logearav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model Radioactivity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of cluster radioactivity and the preformed cluster model, exploring its implications in nuclear decay processes. Participants seek to clarify the model's mechanics and its relationship to nuclear forces, particularly in the context of heavy nuclei decaying into lighter clusters like Helium and Carbon.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Cluster radioactivity involves heavy nuclei decaying into lighter clusters, with the preformed cluster model serving as a calculation tool for this process.
  • Some participants describe the preformed cluster model as considering the emitted nucleus as existing within the parent nucleus, focusing on quantum tunneling probabilities for decay.
  • There is a discussion on the analogy between the preformed cluster model and the Gamow model of alpha decay, particularly regarding the binding energies of emitted clusters.
  • One participant questions the interpretation of "cluster rattling around" as the time taken for the cluster to escape the parent nucleus, seeking clarification on this concept.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions made in calculating the kinetic energy of the cluster based on binding energy differences, with some participants expressing discomfort with these assumptions.
  • Participants debate whether cluster radioactivity falls under the category of strong interactions, with one participant asserting that it does not, while acknowledging the necessity for clusters to be tightly bound for observable decay probabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between cluster radioactivity and strong interactions, indicating a lack of consensus on this aspect. Additionally, there are varying interpretations of the preformed cluster model's mechanics and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the model's effectiveness may depend on the binding energies of the clusters and the assumptions regarding nuclear potentials, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
cluster radioactivity --- preformed cluster model

In cluster radioactivity,
heavy nuclei decay to form Helium, Carbon, Nitrogen, Silicon etc. I came across the term Preformed cluster model. What is preformed cluster model? Members, could you please throw some light on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The preformed cluster method was developed by R K Gupta and others as a calculation tool.

You will be familiar with it as an extension of the usual way of calculating alpha decay half life.

In this model you consider the emitted nucleus (the cluster) as existing inside the parent nucleus hence preformed cluster.

You then calculate the probability of the cluster quantum tunnelling out of the parent nucleus. When this is multiplied by a measure of the rate at which the cluster is rattling around inside the parent you get the rate of decay and hence the half life.

So you can see the analogy with the Gamov model of alpha decay where the preformed cluster is He4.

The method works best for clusters of high binding energy (He4, C12 etc) but even so care needs to be paid to the form of the nuclear potential assumed. With alpha decay you can get remarkably good
results with a very crude model for the nuclear potential but this is not the case for heavier clusters.

Hope this helps

Regards

Sam
 


Thanks a lot Mr. Sam for your reply. You said "cluster rattling around inside the parent". I construe this as the time taken by the cluster or attempts made by the cluster to come out of the parent nuclei. Am i correct?
 


Opps Yes When I said 'rattling around' it was a crude description but just about as crude as Gamow in his original papers (see G. Gamow Ziet fur Phys. 51,204 and 52,510 both from 1928 if you read German and can interpret the Gothic script used as a typeface in those days )

The idea is the cluster (ie the nucleus to be emitted) bangs around in a sphere of radius 1.3 * 10 -15 *A 1/3 metres where A is the atomic weight (eg 238 in uranium 238)

(this remarkably accurate result works to a high degree of accuracy for all but the most tightly bound nuclei – on a more sophisticated level it tells us the strong force in nuclei becomes saturated )

The kinetic energy of the cluster is assumed by Gamow to be the difference in the binding energy of the parent nucleus and the products (an assumption I personally have never been comfortable with). Hence you can calculate the velocity and therefore the transit time of the cluster in the nucleus thus the time factor to multiply with quantum tunnelling probability.

Regards

Sam
 


Thanks again Mr. Sam. Do cluster radioactivity comes under the category " Strong interaction"?
 


The simple answer is NO


I could write a textbook on the 'strong nuclear force' but by the time it got into the bookshops it would be out of date.

The strong force (in an nucleus) is a 'left over' of the force holding the protons and neutrons together (both made up of 3 quarks – the strong force holding them)

It only has relevance to cluster decay in that the cluster must be tightly bound to have any observable probability of decay.


Regards

Sam
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K