CMB Redshift Question (Visible Wavelengths)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation transitioned from infrared to the visible spectrum, reaching a temperature of approximately 3000 Kelvin around 380,000 years post-Big Bang. During this phase, the night sky would have been bright due to the uniform distribution of CMB photons. The misconception that the CMB originated as gamma-ray radiation was corrected; it primarily started as infrared with some visible light. The CMB redshift is approximately 1100, indicating significant expansion since its emission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation
  • Familiarity with redshift concepts in cosmology
  • Knowledge of temperature scales in astrophysics
  • Basic principles of photon scattering and ionization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of CMB redshift on cosmic evolution
  • Study the properties of blackbody radiation at different temperatures
  • Explore the timeline of the universe from the Big Bang to the present
  • Learn about the ionization state of the early universe and its effects on photon propagation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology interested in the early universe and the properties of cosmic radiation.

Capler
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've looked quite a bit on this forum and also elsewhere online and I cannot really find any information on my inquiry. If this is a double post please delete and send me in the right direction.

Now I may be totally off on my thought process, but as I understand it the CMB first started off as gamma ray radiation and has since redshifted to the radio.

At some point in this redshift journey it must have passed through the visible spectrum.

Which leads me to my question: If we were alive during that time when it was shifting through the visible (assuming there was a time), would the "night's" sky have been bright? Since the CMB is literally everywhere, would we not even be able to see due to overexposure?

Or would the CMB have not been intense enough to even visibly see during this time?

Once again thanks for any insight!
 
Space news on Phys.org
Capler said:
I've looked quite a bit on this forum and also elsewhere online and I cannot really find any information on my inquiry. If this is a double post please delete and send me in the right direction.

Now I may be totally off on my thought process, but as I understand it the CMB first started off as gamma ray radiation and has since redshifted to the radio.

At some point in this redshift journey it must have passed through the visible spectrum.

Which leads me to my question: If we were alive during that time when it was shifting through the visible (assuming there was a time), would the "night's" sky have been bright? Since the CMB is literally everywhere, would we not even be able to see due to overexposure?

Or would the CMB have not been intense enough to even visibly see during this time?

Once again thanks for any insight!

Yes the night sky would have been bright. Uniform temperature of about 3000 kelvin.

According to the standard cosmo model the CMB photons date from a time about 380,000 years from start of expansion and the CMB redshift is about 1100.

Before that the hydrogen gas filling space was sufficiently ionized so as to be effectively opaque---photons had a limited mean free path and were always being scattered. The temperature was above 3000 K. The CMB photons date from the moment that the medium cooled enough to become effectively transparent.

You are mistaken about the CMB starting as gammaray. It would have started as mostly infrared with a small percentage of visible, like the glow off a star that is 3000 K, more orange than the sun, not so hot has the sun.

If you remember the CMB redshift z = 1100, and the presentday CMB temperature T = 2.728 K, then you can multiply to get the temperature back then when the photons began their journey.

2.7 x 1100 = about 3000

The same factor works for the ratio of wavelengths.

As you can imagine, anyone back then bathed in that early light would be rapidly cooked.
 
Last edited:
Hmm.. awesome. Thanks for the reply and correction about my gamma ray misconception.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K