Al9
- 1
- 0
What could change if a collider like LHC would be built and made function in Earth's orbit or on another planet like Mars?
The discussion centers on the feasibility of constructing a particle collider similar to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Earth's orbit or on Mars. Key points include the challenges of gravity, cost, and data transmission, which would significantly increase the complexity and expense of such a project. Despite the potential for a vacuum in space being superior to that of the LHC, the overall gains in particle physics would be negligible compared to the enormous costs involved. Additionally, the necessity of underground construction for shielding against cosmic rays is emphasized, as well as the benefits of minimizing surface land use.
PREREQUISITESParticle physicists, aerospace engineers, and researchers interested in the implications of constructing colliders in non-Earth environments.

The gain would be negligible (if anything) and the increase is cost would be ENORMOUS, so it's not a good idea.Al9 said:What could change if a collider like LHC would be built and made function in Earth's orbit or on another planet like Mars?
Colliders are not built underground due to cosmic rays. The opposite actually: Muons are routinely used for detector alignment. Too much shielding would be bad.ChrisVer said:hmmm, what would you answer to someone who would ask you "why did we dig up 100m into the Earth to put the collider?"... we need some shielding from "outer" particles (e.g. cosmic rays)