B Can Unlimited Energy Launch Objects into Orbit Using Accelerator Technology?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of launching a 200lb object into low Earth orbit using accelerator technology, assuming unlimited energy for the lift mechanism. Key points include the necessity of achieving escape velocity to avoid re-entry and the importance of trajectory, with vertical launches being more efficient but requiring additional propulsion for orbital insertion. The concept of "infinite energy" is criticized as unrealistic, with suggestions to focus on practical energy sources and methods. Participants explore various launch techniques, including the potential of a space elevator and the implications of having unlimited energy on orbital mechanics. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of launch dynamics and the need for realistic constraints in space launch discussions.
  • #31
sophiecentaur said:
Seriously not the best way to start thinking about a launch system. We don't have any energy (money) to spare for that sort of exercise.
Isn't that why it was specified - so the first answer isn't "can't be done, energy/money"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
OutOfTheBox said:
Summary:: Trying to understand the factors of a launch concept

If an infinite amount of energy were available to create the lift mechanism for a space launch. What would be required to fire a 200lb object into low Earth orbit(160km) after speeding it up in a way similar to how the large hadron collider speeds up a particle.

Assuming the launch vehicle would:
A. Use technology x to protect its cargo from the effects of the G-force's it would be exposed to
B. Have a drag coefficient of 0.04
C. Have no additional propulsion after launch
D. Launch at sea level

The first questions I am looking to understand include:
1. Trajectory wise, is it more efficient to launch the object perpendicular to the Earth's surface like a rocket or at an angle like a ramp?
2. what is the minimum speed the object needs to be going when it leaves the Earth's surface to reach low Earth orbit unassisted?
This concept has been explored in detail not for Earth launch because of the atmosphere, but for lunar launch of material for building large space structures. Not a space gun but an electromagnetic launcher called a Mass Driver. In that case high gee forces are not an issue because humans are not being launched and there are no drag forces. Physicist Gerard K. O'Neill developed the concept in the 1970's to support his vision of building large space colonies. It is interesting that his background was accelerator physics. Solar energy can be used which qualifies as unlimited.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_driver#:~:text=A mass driver or electromagnetic,by electricity to make electromagnets.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
bob012345 said:
This concept has been explored in detail not for Earth launch because of the atmosphere, but for lunar launch of material for building large space structures. Not a space gun but an electromagnetic launcher called a Mass Driver. In that case high gee forces are not an issue because humans are not being launched and there are no drag forces. Physicist Gerard K. O'Neill developed the concept in the 1970's to support his vision of building large space colonies. It is interesting that his background was accelerator physics. Solar energy can be used which qualifies as unlimited.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_driver#:~:text=A mass driver or electromagnetic,by electricity to make electromagnets.
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K