Collision of alpha with Be -> C + gamma

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the reaction of alpha particles with beryllium, specifically the equation α + 9Be --> 13C + γ. Participants are tasked with calculating the Q value for this reaction and determining the energy of the 13C nucleus and emitted gamma radiation from 5-MeV alpha particles. A key point of contention is the assumption that the momentum of the gamma ray can be neglected, which simplifies calculations but raises questions about momentum conservation. It is noted that while the assumption is valid for practical purposes, the problem can still be solved without it, albeit with increased complexity. The conversation emphasizes the balance between simplifying assumptions and the accuracy of physical calculations.
Elvis 123456789
Messages
158
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Before the discovery of the neutron, it was proposed that the penetrating radiation produced when beryllium was bombarded with alpha particles consisted of high-energy &gamma rays (up to 50 MeV) produced in reactions such as α + 9Be --> 13C + γ

a.) Calculate the Q value for this reaction.

b.) If 5-MeV alpha particles are incident on 9Be, calculate the energy of the 13C nucleus and, hence, determine the energy of gamma radiation assuming it is emitted as a single photon. Hint: You may neglect the momentum of the γ ray relative to the 13C nucleus. Masses: m(4He) = 4.0026u, m(9Be) = 9.0122u, m(13C) = 13.0034u

Homework Equations


m(Z, N) = A*1u +Δ where the Δ stands for the mass excess and A = Z + N

Q = (mc + md - ma - mb)c2

The Attempt at a Solution


My main gripe with this problem is that i don't understand why we can neglect the momentum of the gamma ray when conserving momentum. I did the problem with the assumption but can the problem still be done without it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elvis 123456789 said:
I did the problem with the assumption but can the problem still be done without it?
Sure, it just makes the calculation a bit more complex, and it leads to the same answer within the precision you can achieve with the given mass numbers as the assumption is a very good approximation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K