Compare Infinities: 0 to 1 vs. 2 to ∞

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of comparing infinities, specifically the assertion that there are as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there are between 2 and infinity, demonstrated through the bijective function 1/x. This function effectively maps the interval from 1 to infinity onto the interval from 0 to 1 in a one-to-one and onto manner, indicating that both intervals have the same cardinality. The fundamental idea is that two sets are considered to have the same size if a complete matching can be established without repetitions. However, it is noted that the set of integers cannot be matched one-to-one with the interval from 0 to 1, suggesting that the latter is a larger infinity. This highlights the complexity of infinite sets and their cardinalities.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I don't know if you can say this, but my teacher said today that there is just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as 2 and ∞. He then said this could easily be seen by looking at the bijective function 1/x. Can anyone try to explain what he meant?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
I don't know if you can say this, but my teacher said today that there is just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as 2 and ∞. He then said this could easily be seen by looking at the bijective function 1/x. Can anyone try to explain what he meant?

The idea to think about is what does it mean for two sets to have the same size. For finite sets we could just count each one and see if the number is the same but underlying this is a more fundamental idea.

That is: Two sets have the same size if there is a way to match the elements of one to the elements of the other so that both sets are used up and only one thing gets matched to one thing. If it is not possible to completely uses up one of the two sets with any matching, then we would say that that set is bigger.So for instance, the set {1,2} and the set {3.4} have the same size because the matching

1 -> 3 and 2->4 uses up both sets and only one number is matched to one other number,

the matching 1->4 ,2->3 also works.

We would not say that the matching

1-> 3, 2->3 means that {3,4} is bigger and that shows why the matching must pair only one number to one other number.

For infinities the idea is exactly the same. Two infinite sets have the same size if it is possible to match each to the other without repetitions. So for instance, the even integers have the same size as all of the integers because each integer can be matched to its double.
1 is matched to 2, 2 to 4, 3 to 6, and so on. This matching is "1 to 1", that is each integer is matched to a different even integer, and "onto" that is both sets are completely matched up.

he function 1/x maps the interval 1 to infinity to the interval 0 1 in a 1-1 and onto way. So the two intervals have the same size.

Interestingly, it is not possible to match the integers 1-1 and onto to the interval 0 to1. The interval can never be completely used up. So its is bigger. It is a bigger infinity.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K