MHB Comparing $gH$ and $Hg$ for Infinite & Finite Groups

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Suppose $G$ is an infinite group and $H$ is an infinite subgroup of $G$.

Let $g\in G$.

Suppose $\forall h\in H\ \exists h'\in H$ such that $gh=h'g$.

Can we conclude that $gH=Hg$?

What if $G$ and $H$ are of finite orders?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
Suppose $G$ is an infinite group and $H$ is an infinite subgroup of $G$.

Let $g\in G$.

Suppose $\forall h\in H\ \exists h'\in H$ such that $gh=h'g$.

Can we conclude that $gH=Hg$?

What if $G$ and $H$ are of finite orders?
I don't have an answer, just an observation. It is possible that given g and h that the h' might generate a subset of H, not all of H. (ie. [math]\exists f: H \to H'[/math] is not an bijection.) In which case [math]gH = H'g \subseteq Hg[/math] in general. I don't know if that helps or not.

-Dan
 
Alexmahone said:
Suppose $G$ is an infinite group and $H$ is an infinite subgroup of $G$.

Let $g\in G$.

Suppose $\forall h\in H\ \exists h'\in H$ such that $gh=h'g$.

Can we conclude that $gH=Hg$?

What if $G$ and $H$ are of finite orders?

Hi Alexmahone,

I believe your statement is correct, but only for finite groups. Suppose $G$ is finite. The given condition implies $gH \subset Hg$. Since there is a bijection $gH \leftrightarrow Hg$, then $gH$ and $Hg$ have the same number of elements. Hence, $gH = Hg$.
 
Actually, the statement also holds when $G$ is commutative, infinite or not. The condition would not be needed in such a case.
 
Your problem rephrased slightly:
If $G$ is a group, $H$ a subgroup of $G$ and $g\in G$ with $gHg^{-1}\subseteq H$, does $gHg^{-1}=H$?

Euge has answered in the affirmative for some cases; also this follows if $g$ has finite order, easy proof.

I think an example is needed that shows this is not always true. To follow the example, you need to know a little about group presentations.

Let $G=<a\,,b\,:\, b^{-1}ab=a^2>,\,H=<a>\text{ and } g=b^{-1}$
Since conjugation is a homomorphism, $gHg^{-1}\subseteq H$. If this conjugation were an onto map, there would exist an integer $k$ with $ga^kg^{-1}=a$. But $ga^kg^{-1}=a^{2k}$ . Since $a$ has infinite order (loosely speaking there is no relation that allows $a$ to have finite order), we would get that $2k=1$, impossible. So $gHg^{-1}\neq H$.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top