Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the left and right cosets of a subgroup \( H \) in a group \( G \), specifically examining the conditions under which \( gH = Hg \) holds true. Participants explore this question for both infinite and finite groups, considering various properties and implications of the subgroup and the element \( g \).
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose that if \( G \) is an infinite group and \( H \) is an infinite subgroup, the condition \( \forall h \in H\ \exists h' \in H \) such that \( gh = h'g \) may not necessarily imply \( gH = Hg \).
- One participant suggests that the mapping \( h \mapsto h' \) might not be a bijection, which could lead to \( gH \subseteq Hg \) in general.
- Another participant argues that the condition holds for finite groups, stating that it implies \( gH \subset Hg \) and that both cosets must have the same number of elements, leading to \( gH = Hg \).
- There is a claim that the statement also holds for commutative groups, regardless of whether they are finite or infinite, without needing the given condition.
- A participant rephrases the problem in terms of conjugation, questioning whether \( gHg^{-1} = H \) under certain conditions, and provides an example illustrating that this is not always true.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the implications of the conditions provided, with no consensus reached on whether \( gH = Hg \) can be concluded in the general case. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the applicability of the conditions to both infinite and finite groups.
Contextual Notes
Participants note that the mappings and relationships discussed depend on the structure of the groups involved, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of the subgroup \( H \) and the element \( g \). Specific examples and counterexamples are provided to illustrate the complexity of the relationships.