Comparing R^2 from log and level models

  • Context:
  • Thread starter Thread starter Usagi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log Models
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 3K views
Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Say we have 2 models:

[tex]ln(y) = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \cdots + \beta_nx_n[/tex] with a known R^2

and

[tex]y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \cdots + \beta_nx_n[/tex] with a known R^2

Now I know that we can not compare the R^2's from these 2 models to determine goodness-of-fit and I am also aware of how we can manipulate the log model so that we can compare, but my question is, what is the reason for which we can't compare? Obviously the dependent variable is the natural log for the first one and the second model is level in terms of y, but is there a deeper reason? Why is it that if the dependent variable's form is different, then we cannot compare the R^2's between the models?

Thanks
 
on Phys.org
Deep as you would like, I would think.

http://www.yale.edu/ciqle/Breen_Scaling%20effects.pdf