Cannot understand this corollary on surreal numbers

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anixx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuum Set
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
0 replies · 2K views
Anixx
Messages
88
Reaction score
11
I cannot understand a corollary from this paper on surreal numbers:

Corollary B. Assuming CH (the Continuum Hypothesis), every maximal Hardy
field is isomorphic as an ordered differential field to the ordered field No(ω1) of
surreal numbers of countable length

Does it say that there are no countable surreal numbers greater than the germs of Hardy fields?
 

Similar threads

High School What are surreal numbers and how do they work?
  • Aakash Lakshmanan
  • · Replies 3 ·
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Graduate Almost Certain = 1? Why Reject Surreal Numbers?
  • lolgarithms
  • · Replies 2 ·
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Graduate Showing Surreal Numbers as a Proper Class
  • Dragonfall
  • · Replies 13 ·
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Graduate What Are Surreal Numbers and Their Binary Expansion?
  • jambaugh
  • · Replies 14 ·
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
14
Tension and Pulleys Cannot understand this problem
  • goddard
  • · Replies 1 ·
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Undergrad I know that line is a one dimension but i cannot understand then why
  • asad1111
  • · Replies 8 ·
  • General Math
Replies
8
Normalizing a wave packet - cannot understand the solution
  • physiker99
  • · Replies 1 ·
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1