Complex Analysis Proof showing that a Polynomial is linear

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a polynomial P(z) is linear under the condition that P(z) is real if and only if z is real. Key insights include the application of the Cauchy-Riemann equations and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (FTA). The participants conclude that if P(z) has a degree greater than one, it must possess complex roots, contradicting the initial condition. Ultimately, the proof establishes that P(z) must be of degree one, confirming its linearity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Familiarity with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (FTA)
  • Knowledge of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Basic complex analysis concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations in complex analysis
  • Explore the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in detail
  • Research properties of real polynomials and their roots
  • Learn about polynomial degree and its relation to linearity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying complex analysis, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of polynomial behavior in relation to real and complex numbers.

QuantumLuck
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose P is a polynomial such that P(z) is real iff. z is real. Prove that P is linear.

The hint given in the text is to set P = u + iv, z = x+iy and note that v = 0 iff y = 0.

We are then told to conclude that
a. either v-sub y(partial of v with respect to y) is greater than or equal to 0 throughout the real axis or is less than or equal to 0 throughout the real axis;

b. either u-sub x(partial of u with respect to x) is greater than or equal to zero or is less than or equal to zero for all real values and hence u is monotonic along the real-axis;

c. P(z) = alpha has only one solution for real-valued alpha.

Homework Equations


Cauchy-Reimann equations.
Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (FTA) (i think)

The Attempt at a Solution



My friend was of the opinion that we can say v > 0 for y > 0, then we must have v < 0 for y < 0 because the FTA says v greater than or equal to 0 for all z is impossible. (yet i do not see how this follows at all and i am not sure the path to a solution that this will bring.

I am not quite sure how the proof is supposed to follow from the given guidelines and any help would be much appreciated (even a hint).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone have any ideas? after thinking some more i realize that b will follow from cauchy reimann equations so long as i have a. but, i fail to see how a, b, and c together define the polynomial P(z) to be linear or how part a is true.
 
Hmmm... I'm not sure off the top of my head, but notice P(z) being real when z is real isn't a very enlightening statement, as any real polynomial satisfies this. So the meat of the proof must lie in P(z) being real only when z is real
 
It's really not clear to me how to prove your hint a). But here's another approach. First show P(z) is a polynomial in z with real coefficients. Now from your knowledge of real polynomials, there is a real number A such that P(x)=A has either one or zero REAL roots (depending on whether the highest power of x is odd or even. That means if it's degree is greater than one, it must have a complex root r. Hence?
 
Thanks a lot Dick I was able to put together what you said with some of my professor's help to solve the problem. he didn't like the books method either. so i had to show that the power of the polynomial couldn't be even or an odd number that is three or greater. hence, it must be one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K