Complex Made Simple: Notation on Disks

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BrainHurts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the notation for open and closed disks in the context of complex analysis as presented in "Complex Made Simple" by David Ullrich. Participants explore the implications of the notation and its relationship to topological concepts, particularly focusing on the meaning of the closure of a disk.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the meaning of the notation \overline{D(z_0,r), questioning its relationship to the open disk D(z_0,r).
  • Another participant asserts that \overline{D(z_0,r)} represents the topological closure of the set D(z_0,r) and suggests it is equal to \bar{D}(z_0,r), indicating a proof may follow in the text.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the notation change, asking why \overline{D(z_0,r)} is used if it is equal to D(z_0,r) ∪ \bar{D}(z_0,r), and whether this distinction serves a theoretical rather than practical purpose.
  • Another participant notes that the term "closed ball" can be misleading, emphasizing that it is not immediately clear that it refers to a closed set, and mentions that this will be addressed later in the book.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the notation and its implications. There is no consensus on the necessity of the different notations or the clarity of the definitions provided in the book.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight that the book does not assume prior knowledge of topology, which may contribute to the confusion surrounding the notation and its implications.

BrainHurts
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm reading "Complex Made Simple" by David Ullrich. He has these notation for disks

[itex]D(z_0,r) = \left\{ z \in \mathbb{C}: |z-z_0|< r \right\}[/itex]

[itex]\bar{D}(z_0,r) = \left\{ z \in \mathbb{C} : |z - z_0| \leq r \right\}[/itex]

I understand that these sets are to be the open and closed disks with radius r respectively.

The one I'm not sure about is what does [itex]\overline{D(z_0,r)}[/itex] mean? Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That means the topological closure of the set [itex]D(z_0, r)[/itex]. It turns out to be equal to [itex]\overline{D}(z_0, r)[/itex] but they probably plan on proving that at some point.
 
Oh thanks so much! This book doesn't assume topology, but one thing I've always been confused on is that

if

[itex]\overline{D(z_0,r)} = D(z_0,r) \cup \bar{D}(z_0,r)[/itex],
why change the notation? I see you said that they turn out to be equal. Is this to specify a more theoretical idea than a practical idea?
 
Saying it a bit differently from O.Shredder, it is not immediate that what is called (kind of confusingly) a closed ball--your definition in the bottom --is not a closed set, and, like Office Shredder said, this will be proved at some later point in the book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K