Hi guys,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If I use the definition of the scalar complex field as the combination of two scalar real fields, I can get

[tex]\phi (x) = \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2\pi )^3} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2p_0}} [ \hat a _{\vec{p}} e^{-ip.x} + \hat b _{\vec{p}}^{\dagger } e^{ip.x}][/tex]

which I can rewrite in terms of (like in Peskin & Schroeder)

[tex]\phi (x) = \phi ^{+} (x) + \phi ^{-} (x)[/tex]

where [itex]\langle 0|\phi ^{-} = 0[/itex] and [itex]\phi ^{+} |0\rangle = 0[/itex].

My problem is: when you try to calculate the contraction of the field with itself

[tex]\text{\contraction}\{\phi (x)\}\{\phi (y)\} = \begin{cases} [\phi ^{+} (x), \phi ^{-} (y)] , & \text{if } x_0 > y_0 \\ [\phi ^{+} (y), \phi ^{-} (x)] , & \text{if } x_0 < y_0 \end{cases}[/tex]

which is supposed to be the Feynman Propagator, you obtain it for a scalar real field, but for a scalar complex field as defined above, you obtain terms with [itex]\hat a _{\vec{p}} \hat b _{\vec{p \prime}}^{\dagger }[/itex]. The operators commute, so the vacuum expectation of these terms would be 0.

I guess I'm wrong, but can someone see where? :)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Complex scalar field and contraction

Loading...

Similar Threads for Complex scalar field |
---|

I Higgs field and inertia |

A Restrictions Placed on a Scalar Field by the Vacuum |

I Super strong magnetic field's effect on radioactivity |

I How does the Higgs scalar potential evolve with temperature? |

A Transformation of a scalar field |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**