MHB Compound Interest: $50000 Invested for 3 Years at 7.75%

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interest
AI Thread Summary
A $50,000 donation to a local high school will be invested for 3 years at an annual interest rate of 7.75%, compounded quarterly. The quarterly interest rate is calculated to be 1.9375%, leading to a multiplier of 1.019375 for each quarter. Over 12 quarters, the total amount can be expressed as $50,000 multiplied by (1.019375) raised to the 12th power. This investment strategy ensures that only the interest earned will be used for purchasing sports equipment. At the end of the investment term, the school will have a significant amount available for this purpose.
kaye
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
An alumnus of a local high school donated $50000 to the school. The amount was invested for 3 years at 7.75%, compounded quarterly. The school has agreed to use only the interest earned on the investment to buy sports equipment. How much money will be available for sports equipment at the end of the investments term?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$A = A_0 \left(1 + \dfrac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}$

$A$ = account balance after $t$ years
$A_0$ = initial account balance
$r$ = annual interest rate as a decimal
$n$ = number of compounding periods per year
 
I tend to prefer not blindly substituting into a formula.

If the interest rate is 7.75% p.a. compounded quarterly, then the quarterly rate is 1.9375%.

So every quarter, you increase by 1.9375%, thus you end up with 101.9375%.

Thus the multiplier is 1.019375

If you're investing for 3 years, then that's 12 quarters.

Thus $\displaystyle A = 50\,000 \times \left(1.019\,375 \right)^{12} $.
 
Even less "blindly": The interest rate is 7.75% annually so 7.75/4= 1.9375% per quarter as Prove It said. That means that after 3 months (one quarter of a year) interest of 50000(0.019375) will be added to the 50000 yielding 50000+ 50000(0.019375)= 50000(1.019375). Since the interest is compounded (neither principle nor interest is collected) quarterly, the next quarter the 1.9375% interest will be calculated on that new 50000(1.019375) so the interest at the end of the second quarter will be (50000(1.019375))(0.019375) and that will be added to the 50000(1.019375) so will be (50000(1.019375))(0.019375)+ 50000(1.019375)= 50000(1.019375)(0.019375+ 1)= 50000(1.0199375)^2.

The third quarter you do the same thing except this time you start with 50000(1.01375)^2 so the interest will be 50000(1.019375)^2(0.019375) added to 50000(1.019375)^2 to get 50000(1.019375)^2(0.019375)+ 50000(1.019375)^2= 50000(1.019375)^2(0.019375+ 1)= 50000(1.019375)^3.

In 3 years there are 3(4)= 12 quarters so you repeat this 12 times getting Prove It's 50000(1.019375)^12.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top