MHB Compound Interest: $50000 Invested for 3 Years at 7.75%

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interest
AI Thread Summary
A $50,000 donation to a local high school will be invested for 3 years at an annual interest rate of 7.75%, compounded quarterly. The quarterly interest rate is calculated to be 1.9375%, leading to a multiplier of 1.019375 for each quarter. Over 12 quarters, the total amount can be expressed as $50,000 multiplied by (1.019375) raised to the 12th power. This investment strategy ensures that only the interest earned will be used for purchasing sports equipment. At the end of the investment term, the school will have a significant amount available for this purpose.
kaye
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
An alumnus of a local high school donated $50000 to the school. The amount was invested for 3 years at 7.75%, compounded quarterly. The school has agreed to use only the interest earned on the investment to buy sports equipment. How much money will be available for sports equipment at the end of the investments term?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$A = A_0 \left(1 + \dfrac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}$

$A$ = account balance after $t$ years
$A_0$ = initial account balance
$r$ = annual interest rate as a decimal
$n$ = number of compounding periods per year
 
I tend to prefer not blindly substituting into a formula.

If the interest rate is 7.75% p.a. compounded quarterly, then the quarterly rate is 1.9375%.

So every quarter, you increase by 1.9375%, thus you end up with 101.9375%.

Thus the multiplier is 1.019375

If you're investing for 3 years, then that's 12 quarters.

Thus $\displaystyle A = 50\,000 \times \left(1.019\,375 \right)^{12} $.
 
Even less "blindly": The interest rate is 7.75% annually so 7.75/4= 1.9375% per quarter as Prove It said. That means that after 3 months (one quarter of a year) interest of 50000(0.019375) will be added to the 50000 yielding 50000+ 50000(0.019375)= 50000(1.019375). Since the interest is compounded (neither principle nor interest is collected) quarterly, the next quarter the 1.9375% interest will be calculated on that new 50000(1.019375) so the interest at the end of the second quarter will be (50000(1.019375))(0.019375) and that will be added to the 50000(1.019375) so will be (50000(1.019375))(0.019375)+ 50000(1.019375)= 50000(1.019375)(0.019375+ 1)= 50000(1.0199375)^2.

The third quarter you do the same thing except this time you start with 50000(1.01375)^2 so the interest will be 50000(1.019375)^2(0.019375) added to 50000(1.019375)^2 to get 50000(1.019375)^2(0.019375)+ 50000(1.019375)^2= 50000(1.019375)^2(0.019375+ 1)= 50000(1.019375)^3.

In 3 years there are 3(4)= 12 quarters so you repeat this 12 times getting Prove It's 50000(1.019375)^12.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top