Compute Tidal Locking Radius: Planet/Moon Area

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rieman zeta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Tidal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The tidal locking radius of a planet or moon can be computed using a specific formula derived from Burn's chapter in "Satellites" (U of Az Press). The formula is T = 16 rho omega a^6 (Q/k2) / (45 G M^2), where rho is the density of the body, omega is the initial rotation rate, a is the semi-major axis, Q/k2 is the dissipation function divided by the second order Love number, and M is the mass of the body doing the despinning. This formula demonstrates that the time constant for tidal locking is dependent on the mass and distance of the bodies involved, specifically showing an a^6/M^2 relationship. Understanding this relationship is crucial for calculating tidal locking timescales accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tidal locking concepts
  • Familiarity with gravitational physics and orbital mechanics
  • Knowledge of the parameters involved in the formula (density, rotation rate, semi-major axis, etc.)
  • Basic grasp of the Love number and its significance in tidal interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Burn's formula in "Satellites" for tidal locking
  • Research the significance of the dissipation function Q and the second order Love number k2 in tidal interactions
  • Explore numerical methods for calculating tidal locking timescales for various celestial bodies
  • Investigate the effects of different densities and rotation rates on tidal locking dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and planetary scientists interested in the dynamics of tidal locking and its implications for celestial body interactions.

rieman zeta
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How does one compute the tidal locking radius of say a planet on a putative moon its area?

Is there a formula?
rieman zeta
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There's a formula for how fast tidal lock occurs, see for instance

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.science/msg/e05283a619187a8f?dmode=source&hl=en

Both you and Geoffrey have rightly commented on my poorly-defined
variables, so let me re-state this. BTW, I'm cribbing this formula (very
slightly modified) from somewhere else, namely Burn's chapter in
"Satellites" (U of Az Press), edited by Burns & Mathews:

T = 16 rho omega a^6 (Q/k2) / ( 45 G M^2 )
rho = density of body being despun [kg/m^3]
omega = inital rotation rate of body being despun [rad/s]
= 2 pi / P, where P is the inital rotation rate
a = semi-major axis of orbit [m]
Q/k2 = dissipation function divided by the 2nd order Love #
M = mass of body doing the despinning [kg]

I hope this is clearer - I've taken the formula for the despinning
timescale out of Burn's chapter and modified it very slightly.


The very rough justification for this formula goes like this:

tidal height is proportional to (M/a)^3
stored tidal energy is proportioanl to tidal height squared
some fraction of the stored tidal energy gets disapated every cycle. A cycle occurs every time the planet rotates.

This gives a M^2/a^6 dependence on the tidal braking torque, or an a^6/M^2 dependence on the "time constant". This addresses only the dependence on mass and distance, but those are the main variables of interest.

'a' here is the semi-major axis of the orbit of the body being locked around the more massive body, what you would be calling (I think) the "tidal locking radius" of the more massive body.

Note that you have to specify the time allowed for the lock occurred - theoretically, anything will lock up given enough time.

For more details, see the quoted textbook source. I really don't know much more than what I've quoted (plus the comments I've added about the a^6 dependency) - specifically I don't have much insight into the numerical values of Q and k2 (though Brian Davis probably does, I don't think he's on this board).
 
Last edited:
thanks

Although I am light years ahead of where I was before your reply, I would invite others to continue to edify me.

Thanks
Riemann Zeta
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K