Conceptual problem on black hole singularity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of singularities in black holes, specifically addressing the notion of infinite density and zero volume. Participants explore the implications of general relativity in extreme conditions and the potential need for new physics to explain these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a black hole singularity is characterized by infinite density and zero volume, questioning how this is possible.
  • Others propose that the idea of infinite density at zero volume may indicate a limitation of general relativity, suggesting that new physics may be required to understand such extreme conditions.
  • One participant draws a parallel between the singularity in black holes and the breakdown of Newtonian mechanics at high velocities, although this analogy is contested by another participant who points out the differences in theoretical frameworks.
  • A later reply suggests the singularity in Coulomb's Law as an alternative example of a singularity, indicating a search for better analogies to illustrate the concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of singularities and the applicability of general relativity, with no consensus reached on the nature of singularities or the necessity for new physics.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of general relativity at singularities and the interpretation of infinite density and zero volume. The discussion highlights the complexity of extending existing theories to accommodate extreme conditions.

assassinsdoc
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I've read that there's a point in a black hole where matter is infinitely dense. There is zero volume but infinite density.
How is it possible for something to have zero volume but have an infinite density at the same time?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I've read that there's a point in a black hole where matter is infinitely dense.
Probably not, but we don't know.

How is it possible for something to have zero volume but have an infinite density at the same time?
The combination of both is way better than a finite volume with infinite density (which would have an infinite mass). There is no fundamental problem with such a singularity, it's just our knowledge of physics that does not work there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
assassinsdoc said:
I've read that there's a point in a black hole where matter is infinitely dense. There is zero volume but infinite density.

That is the result that general relativity predicts - if you assume that general relativity applies at arbitrarily small distances and high arbitrarily high densities. We could just as reasonably take this result as a hint that general relativity doesn't apply under such extreme conditions and that we'll need to extend GR with some new physics to handle this problem.

Similar things have happened before. Newtonian mechanics works just fine until you try applying it to objects moving at speeds near that of light, and then you have to extend it with special relativity to handle those extreme velocities.
 
Nugatory said:
Similar things have happened before. Newtonian mechanics works just fine until you try applying it to objects moving at speeds near that of light, and then you have to extend it with special relativity to handle those extreme velocities.
Well, that's a bit different. Newtonian physics would work fine with arbitrary velocities - if there is a preferred reference frame. There is no theoretical issue with that theory, it just does not happen to be realized.
 
mfb said:
Well, that's a bit different. Newtonian physics would work fine with arbitrary velocities - if there is a preferred reference frame. There is no theoretical issue with that theory, it just does not happen to be realized.

Fair enough... I was a bit uncomfortable with that example for exactly that reason, then decided that it was close enough to make the point about the limits of applicability of a theory even though it's not quite the same... What would be better example?
 
Nugatory said:
What would be better example?
The singularity in Coulomb's Law as r -> 0?
 
bapowell said:
The singularity in Coulomb's Law as r -> 0?

D'oh. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K