Conceptual question about syphons

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cmd5403
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical feasibility of siphoning a liquid from a pool of water back to itself, exploring various factors such as gravity, pressure, and friction. Participants consider theoretical scenarios and the implications of different fluid behaviors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if both ends of the siphon are below the liquid's surface and the air is removed, the liquid could flow indefinitely due to the vacuum created, assuming no friction.
  • Another participant agrees that disregarding friction leads to an unphysical result, mentioning that it might work temporarily with a superfluid.
  • A third participant notes that many systems could theoretically circulate indefinitely without friction.
  • A later reply challenges the viability of the siphon even with superfluid, stating that the fountain effect observed in superfluid helium is actually driven by thermal radiation rather than a perpetual flow.
  • One participant concludes that any low pressure created by the moving fluid could be compensated by fluid entering from either end, implying a limitation in the siphoning concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of siphoning in this context, with some suggesting theoretical possibilities while others argue against them, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about friction, pressure dynamics, and the behavior of superfluids are not fully explored, leaving gaps in the analysis of the proposed siphoning scenario.

cmd5403
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is it physically possible to syphon a liquid from a pool of water back to itself?

My thoughts: Variables involved are acceleration due to gravity, change in height, surface tension, air pressure, friction, radius inside and vacuums. If you take all the air out of the tube and place both ends below the surface of the liquid, the pressure at the ends, the radius, and the surface tension don't matter. Setting both ends at the same height means there's no acceleration. In this kind of system, it seems to me like all you would have to do is apply a force to get the liquid going, and it would keep flowing forever (disregarding friction) due to the vacuum created.

idk, though. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would of course need to disregard friction as you say to get the unphysical result that you desire. Might work for a while with a super fluid. Maybe.
 
Yes, lots of things could go around in a circle forever if there were no friction.
 
John Creighto said:
You would of course need to disregard friction as you say to get the unphysical result that you desire. Might work for a while with a super fluid. Maybe.

It won't work even with a superfluid. The "fountain effect" that is often demonstrated using superfluid helium comes close, but is actually driven by thermal radiation from the environment.
 
I think I see why it wouldn't work. Any low pressure caused by the moving fluid could be filled from either end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
932
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K