Conditional Probability: Converting CDF to PDF for Independent Random Variables

Click For Summary
To convert a conditional cumulative distribution function (CDF) to a conditional probability density function (PDF) for independent random variables, the relationship f(X|Y) = f(X) is utilized, derived from the independence property f(X ∩ Y) = f(X)f(Y). A LaTeX document was created to illustrate this derivation, but concerns were raised about the integration approach used. Specifically, it was noted that the integral should be taken with respect to x while fixing y, rather than the other way around. Additionally, the discussion highlighted that certain inequalities cannot always be simplified into a standard form, emphasizing the complexity of the problem. This exploration aims to clarify the derivation process for a homework problem that is not covered in traditional textbooks.
joshthekid
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Basically I am wondering how you deal with a conditional cdf and turning that into a conditional pdf when the random variables are independent. I know that f(X|Y) =f(X)f(Y)/f(Y)=f(X)

I tried to derive this in a nice attached laTex document but it does not seem right to me.

Note(this is for a homework problem but this is only a derivation I am trying to use to solve it so I decided to post it here because it is not a textbook problem)
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I have only seen this explained as
##f(X|Y) = \frac{f(X \cap Y)}{f(Y)} ## where ##f(X \cap Y) = f(X)f(Y)## by the definition of independence.
In your work, it seems like in part (6) you were taking the integral with respect to y, where you should be considering a fixed y and taking the integral with respect to x.
I have not put pen to paper, but it looks like that could get you something in a more recognizable form.
 
The inequality g(x,y) < z can't necessarily be rewritten in the form x < h(y,z).

For example, the solution x^2 + y < z might require that x be in an interval of the form -a < x < a rather than in an interval of the form x < a.
 
First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K