High School What is Conditional Probability and its Properties?

Click For Summary
Conditional probability, denoted as P(E|F), quantifies the likelihood of event E occurring given that event F has occurred, calculated using the formula P(E|F) = (E∩F)/P(F) when P(F) is not zero. Key properties include that the probability of the sample space given event F is 1, and the addition rule for conditional probabilities, which states P((A∪B)|F) = P(A|F) + P(B|F) - P((A∩B)|F). Additionally, the complement rule indicates that P(E'|F) equals 1 minus P(E|F). Understanding these principles is essential for applying conditional probability effectively in various scenarios. The discussion also suggests using Venn diagrams for visual representation and proof of related probability equations.
CaptainX
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
1. Definition
2. Properties of conditional probability
1. Definition
If E and F are two events associated with the same sample space of a random experment, the conditional probability of the event E given that F has occurred, i.e. P(E|F) is given by
P(E|F) = (E∩F)/P(F) (P≠0)

2. Properties of conditional probability
Let E and F be events of sample space S of an experiment, then we have

2.1 Property 1
P(S|F) = P(F|F) = 1
we know that
P(S|F) = P(S∩F)/P(F) = P(F)/P(F) =1
similiarly, P(F|F)= 1
P(F|F) = P(S|F) = 1

2.2 Property 2
If A and B are any two events of a sample space S and F is an event of S s.t. P(F) ≠ 0, then
P((A∪B)|F) = P(A|F) + P(B|F) -P((A∩B)|F)
In particular, if A and B are disjoint events, then
P((A∪B)|F)=P(A|F)+P(B|F)

2.3 Property 3
P(E'|F) = 1 - P(E|F)
Since S=E∪E' and E and E' are disjoint events.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the question?
 
How to prove P(A∪B)=P(A∩B)+P(A∩B')+P(A'∩B)
 
CaptainX said:
How to prove P(A∪B)=P(A∩B)+P(A∩B')+P(A'∩B)
Try to draw a Venn diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and PeroK
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
745
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K