Conflicting Conventions for Bernoulli Numbers?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bernoulli Confusion
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,779
Reaction score
258
TL;DR
In the Wiki article on Bernoulli numbers, it gives two expressions that, if I understand correctly, are supposed to be equal except at one point. But I am not sure I understand it correctly
In the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_number on Bernoulli’s numbers, it explains that there are two conventions which differ only at m=1. Then it says…

Bernoulli1.PNG


Under “explicit definitions”, it gives, for m>1

Bernoulli2.PNG


So, it seems pretty straightforward that they are saying that (except for m=1) these two expressions are equal, but that all the extra terms in the second expression (+) not included in the first one (-) would cancel out seems so incredible that I think I might be misinterpreting something. Am I?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The expansion of ##(v+1)^m## follows Pascal's triangle, hence binomial coefficients, so yes, the terms can cancel out.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid