Confused about perturbation theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on perturbation theory in quantum mechanics, specifically examining the effects of a P-odd perturbing Hamiltonian, denoted as ##V_P##, on two states of fixed parity, ##| + \rangle## and ##| - \rangle##. The first-order energy corrections for both states are zero, necessitating the use of second-order perturbation theory to derive energy corrections. The calculations reveal that the expectation value of energy in the perturbed state ##| + \rangle'## does not align with the predicted second-order energy shift, prompting further inquiry into the implications of adding a T-odd potential, ##V_{PT}##, to the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first and second-order perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum states and Hamiltonians
  • Knowledge of parity (P) and time-reversal (T) symmetries
  • Ability to perform matrix element calculations in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of second-order energy corrections in perturbation theory
  • Learn about the implications of P-odd and T-odd potentials in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of symmetry in quantum mechanical systems and its impact on calculations
  • Investigate the relationship between wavefunction corrections and energy shifts in perturbation theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in theoretical physics, and researchers exploring perturbation theory and symmetry in quantum systems.

Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! Let's say we have 2 states of fixed parity ##| + \rangle## and ##| - \rangle## with energies ##E_+## and ##E_-## and we have a P-odd perturbing hamiltonian (on top of the original hamiltonian, ##H_0## whose eigenfunctions are the 2 above), ##V_P##. According to 1st order perturbation theory, the corrections to energy for both states is zero. So in order to get any difference in energy we need to go to second order and there the correction to, say, ##| + \rangle## state is:
$$E_+^2 = \frac{|\langle-|V_P|+\rangle|^2}{E_+-E_-}$$ Also the first order correction to the wavefunction implies that ##| + \rangle## becomes:
$$| + \rangle' = | + \rangle + \frac{\langle-|V_P|+\rangle}{E_+-E_-}| - \rangle$$ Now if I want to calculate the expectation value of the energy in this ##| + \rangle'## state, I would get

$$'\langle+|H_0+V_P| + \rangle' = \frac{\langle+|V_P| - \rangle\langle-|V_P|+\rangle}{E_+-E_-}+\frac{(\langle-|V_P| + \rangle)^\dagger\langle-|V_P|+\rangle}{E_+-E_-} + E_+ + \frac{|\langle-|V_P|+\rangle|^2}{(E_+-E_-)^2}E_-$$

So the correction to the energy would be:

$$\frac{\langle+|V_P| - \rangle\langle-|V_P|+\rangle}{E_+-E_-}+\frac{(\langle-|V_P| + \rangle)^\dagger\langle-|V_P|+\rangle}{E_+-E_-} + \frac{|\langle-|V_P|+\rangle|^2}{(E_+-E_-)^2}E_-$$

So there are a few things I am confused about (please let me know if I did any calculation mistakes):

1. Why isn't the expectation value I calculated in the last equation above, equal to the predicted shift in energy by the 2nd order correction? It seems like the expectation value is also second order in ##V_P##, so shouldn't they be the same?
2. If instead of ##V_P## I have a ##V_{PT}## i.e. a potential that is P,T-odd, what should I change in these calculations? In the case of parity it is clear when an expectation value is zero or not, based on the parities of the wavefunctions and the hamiltonian, but what should I do in case the potential is T-odd, too? The tricks from P-odd still applied (i.e. if a matrix element is zero for a P-odd, it is zero for a P,T-odd, too), but what further constraints do I get if I add the T-odd on top?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Second-order impacts on the wave function should still lead to differences in the expectation value via the different coefficients for E+ and E-. I would expect that you need to calculate one order more.
 
mfb said:
Second-order impacts on the wave function should still lead to differences in the expectation value via the different coefficients for E+ and E-. I would expect that you need to calculate one order more.
Thanks! Seems like you are right. I assumed that the second order wave-function would give 3rd order corrections in energy only. Do you have any insight about P-violating vs. P,T violating potentials? I am not sure how would the derivation would change in that case. In principle I am not sure if it would hold at all, as I would get some minus signs from hermicity/anti-hermicity which would screw up my previous derivation.
 
I don't know. Symmetry might simplify some things (and the absence could make it more complicated) but I don't know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K