I was reviewing the first few chapters of Weinberg VolI and found a hole in my understanding in page 112, where he tried to show in the asymptotic past [itex]t=-\infty[/itex], the in states coincide with a free state. In particular, he argued the integral [tex]\int d\alpha\frac{e^{-iE_{\alpha}t}g(\alpha)T_{\beta\alpha}^+\Phi_\beta}{E_\alpha-E_\beta+i\epsilon}\ldots(1)[/tex] would vanish, where [itex]d\alpha=d^3\mathbf{p}[/itex](also involves discrete indices like spin, but of no relevance here). In his argument, he used a contour integration in the complex [itex]E_\alpha[/itex] plane, in which the integral of central interest is the integration along real line [tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty dE_\alpha\frac{e^{-iE_{\alpha}t}g(\alpha)T_{\beta\alpha}^+\Phi_\beta}{E_\alpha-E_\beta+i\epsilon}\ldots(2)[/tex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I don't see how to obtain (2) from (1), since the lower bound of energy is the rest mass, in the best case I could get something like [itex]\int_{m}^\infty dE_\alpha\cdots[/itex], but how could one extend this onto the whole real line.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Confusion (8) from Weinberg's QFT.(Lippmann-Schwinger eqn)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**