Confusion about Derivation of Vacuum Rabi Rate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the vacuum Rabi frequency, denoted as ##\Omega_{S}##, as presented in Metcalf's book "Laser Cooling and Trapping." The equations under scrutiny are $$\hbar \Omega_{S} = -\vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{E_{\omega}}$$ and $$\vec{E_{\omega}} = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{2\epsilon_{0}V}}\vec{\epsilon}$$, where ##\vec{\mu}## represents the dipole moment of a two-level atom and ##\vec{E_{\omega}}## is the electric field per mode. The confusion arises regarding the interpretation of ##E_{\omega}## as the vacuum-state field, specifically its relation to the expected value of the electric field in the vacuum state. The participant proposes that the evaluation of the electric field near the atom is crucial to understanding the vacuum Rabi rate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically two-level systems.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of dipole moments and electric fields in quantum optics.
  • Knowledge of the vacuum state in quantum field theory.
  • Basic grasp of Hamiltonian mechanics and interaction terms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the vacuum Rabi frequency in detail from "Laser Cooling and Trapping" by Metcalf.
  • Explore the concept of the expected value of electric fields in quantum states.
  • Research the role of the interaction Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics.
  • Examine the implications of spontaneous emission on electric field evaluations near atoms.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum optics, particularly those studying atomic interactions with electromagnetic fields and the principles of laser cooling and trapping.

Twigg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
893
Reaction score
483
Hi all,

I am learning about the vacuum Rabi frequency for the first time in Metcalf's book Laser Cooling and Trapping (Section 2.2). I am trying to make sense of the following two equations Metcalf gives:
$$\hbar \Omega_{S} = -\vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{E_{\omega}}$$ and $$\vec{E_{\omega}} = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{2\epsilon_{0}V}}\vec{\epsilon}$$ where ##\Omega_{S}## is the vacuum Rabi frequency for the mode ##S = | \vec{k}, \vec{\epsilon} \rangle##, ##\mu## is the dipole moment of a two-level atom, and ##\vec{E_{\omega}}## is the "electric field per mode".

I see that the expression for ##\vec{E_{\omega}}## is obtained from setting the energy of the field equal to the zero-point energy of the radiation field: $$ \epsilon_{0} E_{\omega}^{2} V = \frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega$$
However, I am confused why ##E_{\omega}## is the vacuum-state field in this case. If I'm not mistaken, this field is the expected value of the electric field per mode for the vacuum state: ##\langle 0 | \vec{E_{\omega}} | 0 \rangle##, since it has the same energy per mode as the vacuum state. On the other hand, the Rabi rate is typically an off-diagonal element of the interaction Hamiltonian. So why isn't the first equation ##\hbar \Omega_{S} = -\vec{\mu} \cdot \langle 1_{S} | \vec{E} | 0 \rangle##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I came up with a possible solution. I believe the key lies in where the electric field is being evaluated. The field of a photon emitted spontaneously will propagate away from the atom, so while there may be a photon in the radiation field, the field near the atom is still the expected field of the ground state. Am I on the right track?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K