Confusion regarding the Boltzman distribution as it applies to paramagnetism

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Boltzmann distribution to paramagnetism in thermal physics. Participants clarify that in a system of independent magnetic spins, the Boltzmann factor is used to calculate the probability distribution of spins in different energy states, influenced by an external magnetic field \(\vec{B}\). The relationship between the thermal energy of the reservoir (kT) and the magnetic states of spins is emphasized, explaining that thermal agitation allows some spins to occupy higher energy states, thereby affecting the overall magnetization of the material. The net magnetization is derived from the difference in populations of spins in aligned and anti-aligned states, demonstrating the interplay between temperature and magnetic behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Boltzmann distribution and its formula: P_{n}= e^(\frac{-E_{n}}{kT})/Z
  • Basic knowledge of magnetic moments and their potential energy in a magnetic field: E_{n}=\pm\vec{μ}\vec{B}
  • Familiarity with concepts of thermal reservoirs and temperature (T) in statistical mechanics
  • Concept of partition function (Z) and its role in normalizing probability distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Boltzmann distribution in statistical mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between temperature and magnetization in paramagnetic materials
  • Investigate the effects of thermal agitation on magnetic dipole alignment
  • Learn about the role of partition functions in various thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students in thermal physics, particularly those studying paramagnetism, as well as educators and researchers interested in the statistical mechanics of magnetic materials.

FluxPin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in an introductory thermal physics course, and today we
learned about the Boltzmann factor and how to use it to calculate
various quantities with the corresponding probability distribution. All was going well until we got to the subject of paramagnetism.

We supposed a system of independent magnetic spins, pointing either
parallel or anti-parallel to the Magnetic field given by \vec{B}. In other
words, there are N spins each with magnetic moment \vec{μ} in contact with a
thermal reservoir of temperature T.

I understand that each spin has a potential energy given by
E_{n}=\pm\vec{μ}\vec{B} (A basic E&M result). However, I DON'T really understand how we can relate this
quantity to the Boltzmann distribution: P_{n}= e^(\frac{-E_{n}}{kT})/Z where Z is the partition function which normalizes the distribution.

How can the thermal energy of the reservoir (kT) can be related to the
purely magnetic state of each magnetic spin? I'm clearly missing
something since this makes no sense to me. Is energy also going into
the thermal energy of these spins and we are just not considering it?
I'm quite confused by this concept and any clarification would be most
appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it in the other order: the spins don't determine the reservoir, but rather the reservoir sets the temperature of the magnetic material, allowing you to calculate the magnetization. Electrons can be in two states (aligned and anti-aligned) having energies +/-E_n; the Boltzmann distribution tells you the fractions of total electrons, P_1=N_1/N and P_2=N_2/N, that are in each state. The net magnetization is then
M=N(P_1-P_2)\mu=(N_1-N_2)\mu.
 
I understand that the magnetic moments do not determine the reservoir. What I'm having a conceptual issue with is why the temperature of the magnetic material (which I understand is completely dependent on the reservoir) can be related to its magnetization (i.e. the probability of a moment aligning itself along the field) with the Boltzmann distribution.
marcusl said:
the reservoir sets the temperature of the magnetic material, allowing you to calculate the magnetization.
How does the temperature of the material determine its magnetization?
 
Last edited:
The temperature is not causing the magnetization, it's partially preventing it. If the temperature was absolute zero, all the dipoles would sit happily in the lower energy state and the system would be fully magnetized. Thermal agitation kicks a fraction of them to the higher energy state, reducing the magnetization.
 
Okay, all the dipoles being in their lowest energy level at absolute zero makes. The thing I still don't get is how the thermal energy of the reservoir puts the individual dipoles into their higher energy magnetic state. That is, he mechanism by which they are "kicked" into the higher energy state.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K