Confusion with definition and notation of reciprocal.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definitions and notations related to the concept of reciprocals and multiplicative inverses, particularly in the context of rational numbers and real numbers. Participants explore the implications of notation and operations involved in defining these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the multiplicative inverse is defined, specifically asking if there is an operation that transforms a/b to b/a for a rational number.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether the notation 1/x is a unique symbol or represents the operation of dividing 1 by x, raising the question of whether division is part of obtaining the inverse.
  • A participant asserts that the reciprocal of a non-zero number is defined as the number that, when multiplied by the original number, yields 1.
  • There is a suggestion that the inquiry may be more about notation than the underlying mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of notation and operations involved in defining reciprocals, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on whether the process of obtaining the inverse includes division or is simply a matter of notation. The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in definitions and the interpretation of mathematical symbols.

infranatural
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have some conceptual issues with aforementioned definitions.

How is exactly multiplicative inverse defined? Say, for a rational, nonzero number a/b, its reciprocal is b/a. Is there a certain operation that transforms a/b to b/a?

Also, the notation for multiplicative inverse of any real number (except zero) x is 1/x. Is 1/x a unique symbol or one that indicates operation of division of 1 by x?
For example, if x=2/3, should i see its inverse as 1/x=3/2, or as an operation of division, that is 1/x=1/(2/3)? I know that in the end the answer is the same, but what i'd like to know is if division is included in the "process" of obtaining that inverse or is it by definition that we just "flip" the numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey,

a^-b

(a "raised to" -b)

Or do you mean an alternative way to this too?
 
The Jericho said:
Hey,

a^-b

(a "raised to" -b)

Or do you mean an alternative way to this too?

No, no, a/b, a rational number, where a is some nonzero integer, and b is a natural number. No exponentiation here.
 
If a is any non-zero number then its reciprocal is defined as the number, b, such that ab= 1.

"Is 1/x a unique symbol or one that indicates operation of division of 1 by x?" Yes, it indicate division of 1 by x. If ab= 1, and a is not 0, we can divide both sides by a to get b= 1/a.

Your question seems to be more about notation than mathematics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K