Confusion with definition and notation of reciprocal.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 3K views
infranatural
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have some conceptual issues with aforementioned definitions.

How is exactly multiplicative inverse defined? Say, for a rational, nonzero number a/b, its reciprocal is b/a. Is there a certain operation that transforms a/b to b/a?

Also, the notation for multiplicative inverse of any real number (except zero) x is 1/x. Is 1/x a unique symbol or one that indicates operation of division of 1 by x?
For example, if x=2/3, should i see its inverse as 1/x=3/2, or as an operation of division, that is 1/x=1/(2/3)? I know that in the end the answer is the same, but what i'd like to know is if division is included in the "process" of obtaining that inverse or is it by definition that we just "flip" the numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey,

a^-b

(a "raised to" -b)

Or do you mean an alternative way to this too?
 
The Jericho said:
Hey,

a^-b

(a "raised to" -b)

Or do you mean an alternative way to this too?

No, no, a/b, a rational number, where a is some nonzero integer, and b is a natural number. No exponentiation here.
 
If a is any non-zero number then its reciprocal is defined as the number, b, such that ab= 1.

"Is 1/x a unique symbol or one that indicates operation of division of 1 by x?" Yes, it indicate division of 1 by x. If ab= 1, and a is not 0, we can divide both sides by a to get b= 1/a.

Your question seems to be more about notation than mathematics.