Is the Union of Intersecting Connected Sets Always Connected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rainwyz0706
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The union of two connected subsets A and B of a topological space X, where A intersects the closure of B, is always connected. This conclusion is established by demonstrating that if A and B were to be expressed as a union of disjoint open sets, it would contradict the given condition of A intersecting the closure of B. The specific case of the union of the open ball B((-1, 0), 1) and the closed ball B((1, 0), 1) also confirms this property, as any attempt to separate them into disjoint sets fails due to their intersection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological spaces and connectedness
  • Familiarity with the concept of closures in topology
  • Knowledge of open and closed sets
  • Basic proof techniques in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of connected spaces in topology
  • Learn about the closure operator and its implications in topological spaces
  • Explore examples of connected and disconnected sets in various topological contexts
  • Investigate the concept of path-connectedness and its relation to connectedness
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology, students studying advanced mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties of connected sets in topological spaces.

rainwyz0706
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Let A, B be two connected subsets of a topological space X such that A intersects the closure of B .
Prove that A ∪ B is connected.

I can prove that the union of A and the closure of B is connected, but I don't know what to do next. Could anyone give me some hints or is there another way to treat this problem?

Also, for the specific case, the union of the open ball B((−1, 0), 1) and closed ball B((1, 0), 1) should be connected, right? I can see it, but I'm not sure how to word the proof. Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would assume AuB is disconnected and try to find a contradiction with A intersecting the closure of B.
 
Let A \cup B = E_1 \cup E_2, with \overline{E_1} \cap E_2 = \emptyset and \overline{E_2} \cap E_1 = \emptyset
(the overline denoting closure). You need to prove one of E_1, E_2 is the empty set.
 
A space is disconnected means that it's the union of two disjoint nonempty open sets. Since we're given that A,B are connected, the only way we could possibly write A u B as a union of disjoint open sets is if A and B are in fact open and disjoint.

You can see this can't be true since A intersects the closure of B, i.e. there's a point a in A such that any neighborhood of a intersects B. But if A is open, then A contains a neighborhood of a, so that A intersects B.
 
Thanks a lot for your guys. I wasn't that clear about the concept in the first place, but now I know how to handle this type of problems.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K