Conservation of angular momentum in positron-electron annihilation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the role of spin in electron-positron annihilation, particularly in the context of angular momentum conservation during two-photon annihilation. Participants explore whether the spins of the electron and positron must be opposite for conservation to hold and examine the implications of spin states on the annihilation process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether opposite spins are necessary for angular momentum conservation in two-photon annihilation, noting a lack of clear conclusions in existing literature.
  • Another participant mentions that while electron-positron pair creation by photons conserves angular momentum, the spins of the particles complicate the annihilation process.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the electron-positron pair must be in a spin zero state, arguing that two emitted photons cannot both be in a spin one state due to the antisymmetry of bosons.
  • One participant proposes that if the electron and positron have aligned spins, the probability of two-photon annihilation could be zero, seeking supporting literature for this claim.
  • Another participant introduces a thought experiment regarding the polarization of spins and questions whether a magnetic interaction could lead to a combined spin state that allows for different types of photon annihilation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of opposite spins for annihilation and the implications of spin states on the process. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in existing literature regarding the spin aspects of electron-positron annihilation, and there are unresolved questions about the mathematical treatment of spin states and their implications for photon emission.

Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
17,871
Reaction score
1,653
TL;DR
if we have spin polarized electrons and positrons, how is the annihilation probability affected by spin orientation?
Pretty much in a nutshell... fielded a question about how spin affects electron positron annihilation... ie do the spins have to be opposite in order to conserve angular momentum for two-photon annihilation to happen?

Intuitively I figured that looks reasonable ... but decided to check, and found lots of discussions of electron-positron scattering re spin polarization, but nothing that seemed to come definitely to a clear conclusion on this. Standard texts on the matter to hand do not cover the spin part... so I am probably forgetting something obvious.

It's been a while.
Someone want to point me in the right direction?

I'll want to understand this fairly solidly (A), but be able to give a description to intermediate level (I).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Creation of electron positron pairs by photons conserved but Wikipedia e-p anhiliation article says conserved. But electron and positron are spin 1/2 and both emitted photons are spin 1.
 
The e-p pair must be in a spin zero state. The two photons cannot be in a spin one state, because the spin addition 1+1=1 is antisymmetric, and the photons are bosons.
 
ie. if the e-p pair had aligned spins, then the probability of 2-photon annihilation is zero?
Is there a paper to back this up?

I am thinking of thought experiment where the spins of both particles are deliberately polarized.
They could have prepared initial polarization angles to whatever angle we want.

If randomly aligned, could I argue that the particles interact magnetically so establishing a spin 1 or spin 0 measured combined state?

Spin 1 allowing odd-photon annihilation and spin 0 allowing even-photon annihilation?

I'm trying to get my head clear on this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
18K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K