Constructing a Multiplicative Inverse Differential Equation with Ease

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of a new n-th order differential equation given a specific n-th order differential equation and a particular solution. Participants explore the feasibility of deriving a differential equation that has the reciprocal of a known particular solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is easy to construct a new differential equation with a particular solution of \(\frac{1}{y_p}\) given a known n-th order differential equation and its particular solution.
  • Another participant provides a specific differential equation and its particular solution, expressing a desire to find a simpler form of a new equation that has \(\frac{1}{y_p}\) as a solution.
  • There is a correction regarding the form of the original differential equation, with participants discussing the correct coefficients and terms.
  • One participant suggests that the general solutions provided earlier are not particular solutions, introducing a clarification about the nature of solutions in differential equations.
  • Another participant proposes a method to derive the new differential equation by letting \(y_p = \frac{1}{Y}\) and forming the differential equation satisfied by \(Y(x)\).
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between trigonometric functions and their exponential forms, with suggestions on simplifying the derived equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of certainty regarding the ease of constructing the new differential equation. Some agree on the method proposed, while others question the definitions and forms of the solutions discussed. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between particular and general solutions, and there are references to specific forms of differential equations that may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of solutions and the simplifications that can be made.

epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
If I know a n-th order differential equation and a particular solution for it, can I easily construct a separate n-th order differential equation if I want the particular solution to be [tex]\frac{1}{y_p}[/tex]?

Key word is easily
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi epkid08! :smile:
epkid08 said:
If I know a n-th order differential equation and a particular solution for it, can I easily construct a separate n-th order differential equation if I want the particular solution to be [tex]\frac{1}{y_p}[/tex]?

Key word is easily

What's yp? :confused:
 
The differential equation is

[tex](x+\alpha)^2y'' + (x + \alpha)y' + a^2y = 0[/tex]

and the particular solution is

[tex]y_p =c_1\cos(a\ln(x+\alpha)) + c_2\sin(a\ln(x+\alpha))[/tex]

So I want to find a differential equation that has a particular solution [tex]\frac{1}{y_p}[/tex].
I've found an 2nd order differential equation that fits what I want, but It's messy and I want to know if there's a faster way to find it than what I did, and also if it simplifies into something similar to the above differential equation.
 
Last edited:
epkid08 said:
The differential equation is

[tex](x^2+\alpha)y'' + (x + \alpha)y' + a^2y = 0[/tex]

and the particular solution is

[tex]y_p =c_1\cos(a\ln(x+\alpha)) + c_2\sin(a\ln(x+\alpha))[/tex]

Isn't that the same as A(x + α)a + B(x + α)-a ?

And are you sure the equation doesn't begin (x + α)2y'' ?
 
tiny-tim said:
Isn't that the same as A(x + α)a + B(x + α)-a ?

And are you sure the equation doesn't begin (x + α)2y'' ?

OOPS! Yes, my mistake, it does begin with [tex](x+\alpha)^2y''[/tex].
 
tiny-tim said:
Isn't that the same as A(x + α)a + B(x + α)-a ?

I'm not sure, are you saying [tex]y_p = A(x + \alpha)^a + B(x + \alpha)^{-a}[/tex]?
Anyways, I'll post the differential equation that fits [tex]1/y_p[/tex], and maybe you can help me simplify it, also this is when alpha equals zero and a equals one:

[tex]x^2\sin(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x))y'' + 2x\cos(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x))y' + [\cos(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x)) - \sin(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x))]y = 0[/tex]It's very similar to the original differential equation, though it seems like it could be simplified!
 
epkid08 said:
If I know a n-th order differential equation and a particular solution for it, can I easily construct a separate n-th order differential equation if I want the particular solution to be [tex]\frac{1}{y_p}[/tex]?

Key word is easily


Just let [itex]y_p=\frac{1}{Y}[/itex] and form the DE that is satisfies by Y(x).

Key word is easy!
 
Hi epkid08! :smile:

First thing: those are not particular solutions, they are general solutions …

If P(y) = 0 has solutions Af(x) + Bg(x),

then P(y) = q(x) has solutions Af(x) + Bg(x) + h(x), where h(x) is any solution of the whole equation.

In other words, the general solution of the whole equation is the general solution of the "incomplete" equation (with 0 on the RHS), plus any particular solution of the whole equation.
epkid08 said:
I'm not sure, are you saying [tex]y_p = A(x + \alpha)^a + B(x + \alpha)^{-a}[/tex]?

oops! :redface:

i left out an i … A(x + α)ia + B(x + α)-ia.

Apart from that, yes

any combination of cos and sin is also a combination of e+i… and e-i…
[tex]x^2\sin(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x))y'' + 2x\cos(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x))y' + [\cos(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x)) - \sin(\frac{\pi}{4}+\ln(x))]y = 0[/tex]

well, cosπ/4 = sinπ/4, so you can divide by that throughout (after expanding the brackets), and get either coslnx and sinlnx or just xi and x-i.
epkid08 said:
If I know a n-th order differential equation and a particular solution for it, can I easily construct a separate n-th order differential equation if I want the particular solution to be [tex]\frac{1}{y_p}[/tex]?

Key word is easily

matematikawan said:
Just let [itex]y_p=\frac{1}{Y}[/itex] and form the DE that is satisfies by Y(x).

Key word is easy!

:smile: nice one, matematikawan! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
961
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K