Constructing Structures with Cardinality W2: A Puzzle in Model Theory

Click For Summary
A structure of cardinality w2 can be constructed using a well-ordered set of size w2, where a specific subset of the first w elements forms a countable substructure. This subset can be closed under defined functions and relations, while any larger subset that includes elements outside this countable set must encompass the entire structure to maintain closure. The discussion clarifies that w2 refers to aleph_2, which is the next cardinality after aleph_1, and emphasizes the distinction between countable and uncountable sets. The participants explore the implications of cardinalities in model theory, particularly how to create structures that meet specific cardinality requirements. Understanding these concepts is crucial for navigating advanced topics in model theory.
Bourbaki1123
Messages
326
Reaction score
0
I was reading Hodges' Model Theory when I came across this question in the first chapter:

Specify a structure of cardinality w2 which has a substructure of cardinality w but no substructure of cardinality w1. (Working in ZFC)

I am assuming w2 means 2w1 but I'm not sure. I haven't really encountered this cardinality before, and I'm not really sure what would have cardinality greater than an uncountable set or what that means intuitively (if there even is an intuitive explanation, or if it is just a bit of logical symbol pushing).

I know that I could take the reals with the field operations, an ordering symbol and 0,1 as a signature and specify the integers as a substructure of order w, and I could take the complex numbers and specify R as a substructure of order w1 in the same way, but I have no idea what to make of w2 or what might have w2 as its cardinality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When he says ``cardinality \omega_2'' he means ``\aleph_2'' which may or may not be 2^{\aleph_1}. If he actually says w_2, then I don't know what he means.
 
Bourbaki1123 said:
I'm not really sure what would have cardinality greater than an uncountable set
Its power set?
 
\omega = \aleph _0 is the smallest infinite cardinal, and it's said to be countably infinite. All larger cardinals are said to be uncountably infinite. \omega _1 = \aleph _1 is the next infinite cardinal larger than \omega, and so it's the first uncountable cardinal. \omega _2 = \aleph _2 is the next infinite cardinal; \omega < \omega _1 < \omega _2. Find a structure M (i.e. a set, together with some function(s) and/or relation(s) on that set) such M has a countable substructure (i.e. there's a countable subset of M closed under those functions/relations) but such that there's no substructure of size \omega _1 that's closed under those functions/relations.

Hint: Let M be some well-ordered set of size \omega _2. Let N be the subset of M consisting of the first (w.r.t. the well-ordering) \omega elements of M. Define a bunch of functions on M such that N is closed under those functions (and thus N forms a countable substructure), but such that any subset of M containing any element outside of N has to contain ALL elements of M in order to be closed under all your functions.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
500
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K