MHB Convert £0.91 to UK Decimal Currency - Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hobo5
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert £0.91 into the old UK currency system, it equates to 18 shillings and 2.4 pence. The calculation involves understanding that there were 240 old pence in a pound, leading to the conversion of 91 new pence to old pence. The discussion also touches on the simplification of currency systems, referencing practices in Canada and Europe. The conversation highlights the complexities of pre-decimal currency while suggesting modern alternatives. Ultimately, the conversion illustrates the historical differences in currency representation.
Hobo5
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Sir,
Would anyone be able to help me with converting the UK decimal currency amount of £0.91 to £ s d
Thank you in advance,
Regards,
P.N.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In the pre-decimal currency of the UK, there were 12 old pence in one shilling and 20 shillings in one pound; thus there were 240 old pence in a pound. (Note that the symbol for the old (pre-decimal) penny is d whereas p is the symbol for the new (decimal) penny.)

If $x$ is the amount of old pence corresponding to 91 new pence, then
$$\frac x{240}\ =\ \frac{91}{100}$$
giving $x=0.91\times240=218.4$.

$218.4\ =\ 18\times20+2.4.$

Hence $£0.91\ \text{(decimal)}\ =\ £\mathrm{0\,\,18\,s\,\,2.4\,d}\ \text{(pre-decimal)}$.
 
EASIER if you do what we did here in Canada:
eliminate the **** penny!
 
Wilmer said:
EASIER if you do what we did here in Canada:
eliminate the **** penny!

Don't you have the problem that you don't know how many dollars there are in a dollar?
Easier if you do what we did here in Europe: only one Euro. :p
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top