A Converting momentum sums to integrals in curved spacetime

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on converting momentum sums to integrals in the context of particle pair production in curved spacetime, referencing Parker and Toms' book. The conversion involves assuming boundary conditions for momentum and understanding the relationship between coordinate and physical volumes. The confusion arises regarding the factor used in the integral for number density, specifically the inclusion of the cosmological scale factor 'a'. The resolution clarifies that the phase of the scalar field solution requires dividing by the physical volume, leading to the factor (2*Pi*a)^-3 in the integral. This explanation resolves the initial query about the additional 'a' in the equation.
KariK
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Is Parker and Toms book wrong calculating number density of particle creation?
I am studying particle pair production using Parker and Toms book: Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime. On page 48 they talk about converting the sum over momentum (k) into an integral. You assume boundary conditions so that k = 2*Pi*n/L, where n is an integer and L is the coordinate length of the cube, the volume of which is L^3. Then on page 60 he derives a formula for the number density of the created particles. There he has the volume as (L*a)^3, with a being the cosmological scale factor. But then in the next line (Equation 2.103) he uses the integral and uses (2*Pi^2*a)^-3 as the factor? (I understand that you get the 4*Pi from the angles integration.) In my mind if the side of the cube is L*a, then k = 2*Pi*n/(L*a), so we have a factor [L*a*dk/(2*Pi)]^3. So the integral in Equation 2.103 should be just (2*Pi)^-3 times the integral. Why do they have the additional a in there? Am I missing something or is the book wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, nobody responded to this question and some time ago I understood the issue, so here is the answer for posterity.
If you solve the Klein-Gordon equation for a scalar field, the answer depends on the phase:
Phi = ...*e^(i*k.x)*..., where k is a constant and x is the comoving coordinate. We demand that the phase is the same at opposite edges of the cube, so we indeed get k*L = 2*Pi*n. For density quantities (number or energy) we have to divide by the physical volume (a*L)^3. So indeed we get the factor (2*Pi*a)^-3.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K