Converting momentum sums to integrals in curved spacetime

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KariK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Momentum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting momentum sums to integrals in the context of particle pair production as outlined in Parker and Toms' book, "Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime." The conversion involves assuming boundary conditions where momentum k is defined as k = 2*Pi*n/L, with L being the coordinate length of a cube. The derived number density of created particles incorporates the cosmological scale factor a, leading to the factor (2*Pi*a)^-3 in Equation 2.103, which is essential for correctly calculating density quantities by dividing by the physical volume (a*L)^3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Knowledge of momentum space and boundary conditions
  • Basic grasp of cosmological scale factors in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation in detail
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in quantum field theory
  • Research the role of the cosmological scale factor in particle physics
  • Examine the conversion of sums to integrals in curved spacetime scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory and cosmology, as well as students studying particle physics and curved spacetime concepts.

KariK
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Is Parker and Toms book wrong calculating number density of particle creation?
I am studying particle pair production using Parker and Toms book: Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime. On page 48 they talk about converting the sum over momentum (k) into an integral. You assume boundary conditions so that k = 2*Pi*n/L, where n is an integer and L is the coordinate length of the cube, the volume of which is L^3. Then on page 60 he derives a formula for the number density of the created particles. There he has the volume as (L*a)^3, with a being the cosmological scale factor. But then in the next line (Equation 2.103) he uses the integral and uses (2*Pi^2*a)^-3 as the factor? (I understand that you get the 4*Pi from the angles integration.) In my mind if the side of the cube is L*a, then k = 2*Pi*n/(L*a), so we have a factor [L*a*dk/(2*Pi)]^3. So the integral in Equation 2.103 should be just (2*Pi)^-3 times the integral. Why do they have the additional a in there? Am I missing something or is the book wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, nobody responded to this question and some time ago I understood the issue, so here is the answer for posterity.
If you solve the Klein-Gordon equation for a scalar field, the answer depends on the phase:
Phi = ...*e^(i*k.x)*..., where k is a constant and x is the comoving coordinate. We demand that the phase is the same at opposite edges of the cube, so we indeed get k*L = 2*Pi*n. For density quantities (number or energy) we have to divide by the physical volume (a*L)^3. So indeed we get the factor (2*Pi*a)^-3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K