Convolution of Time Distributions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on constructing a time distribution for a process performed multiple times through convolution. The user proposes that the distribution for performing a process N times can be represented as a convolution of the individual distributions. They also explore the possibility of combining time distributions from different processes with varying numbers of convolutions. A suggestion is made to use Fourier transforms, highlighting that convolution corresponds to multiplication in the transformed domain. The user expresses intent to test these ideas with various distributions.
SSGD
Messages
49
Reaction score
4
I need some help to make sure my reasoning is correct. Bear with me please.

I have a time distribution for a process and I want to construct a distribution for the time it takes to perform two processes. So I would define

##\tau = t + t##

This would create a new distribution with is a convolution of the process performed twice.

##P(\tau) = P(t)*P(t)##

Now could I do the same for performing the process N times

##\tau = t + t + ... + t = Nt##

##P(\tau) = P(t)*P(t)*...*P(t)##

Could the N convolutions be performed with a change of variables instead

##P(\tau) = P(t)\frac{dt}{d\tau}##

##P(\tau) = P(\frac{\tau}{N})\frac{1}{N}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the above is correct could I also combine time distributions for different process that each had N1 or N2 convolutions.

##z = \tau_1+\tau_2=N_1t_1+N_2t_2##

##P(z) = P_1(\tau_1)*P_2(\tau_2)=\frac{1}{N_1}P_1(\frac{z}{N_1})*\frac{1}{N_2}P_2(\frac{z}{N_2})##
 
SSGD said:
I have a time distribution for a process and I want to construct a distribution for the time it takes to perform two processes. So I would define

τ=t+tτ=t+t\tau = t + t

This would create a new distribution with is a convolution of the process performed twice.
Is that correct. I know that you could form a joint distribution and then project the joint distribution down onto lines of constant sum, but I didn't know that would give the same result as a convolution. If it does, then that is convenient.

SSGD said:
Assuming the above is correct could I also combine time distributions for different process that each had N1 or N2 convolutions
Or you could take the Fourier transform and multiply. That would be my approach.
 
Dale you that is a great idea! I didn't even think about the convolution being a product in the transformed domain. When I get a chance I'm going to do the transforms on a few different distributions and see if the above ideas work out for convolution and change of variables. Thanks.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K