I Coordinate System Transformation: Lowering/Raising Indices Explained

GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
In《Introducing Einstein's Relativity Ed 2》on page 106"lowering the first index with the metric,then it is easy to establish,for example by using geodesic coordinates..."
In 《A First Course in General Relativity - 2nd Edition》on page 159 "If we lower the index a,we get(in the locally flat coordinate system at its origin P)..."
What is the relationship between lowering or raising index and coordinate system transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only relationship is that the components of the "lowered" Riemann tensor ##R_{abcd}## have a particularly simple form in that locally flat coordinate system.
Schutz uses that locally flat coordinate system in his presentation because it enables him to develop a fairly simple formula for Riemann tensor components in terms of metric components like ##g^{ab}## and ##g_{bu,sv}##, rather than in terms of Christoffel symbols (equation 6.63).
He gets a fairly simple formula for ##R^a{}_{bcd}## in that coordinate system (equation 6.65) and then gets an even simpler formula (equation 6.67) for ##R_{abcd}##, ie by lowering the first index.
Most tensor formulas will have coordinate systems in which their component formulas are simple, and in other systems they will be horribly complex. A key challenge in GR is to choose the coordinate system in which the component formulas will be simple and easy(er) to manipulate.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix, vanhees71, GR191511 and 1 other person
andrewkirk said:
The only relationship is that the components of the "lowered" Riemann tensor ##R_{abcd}## have a particularly simple form in that locally flat coordinate system.
Schutz uses that locally flat coordinate system in his presentation because it enables him to develop a fairly simple formula for Riemann tensor components in terms of metric components like ##g^{ab}## and ##g_{bu,sv}##, rather than in terms of Christoffel symbols (equation 6.63).
He gets a fairly simple formula for ##R^a{}_{bcd}## in that coordinate system (equation 6.65) and then gets an even simpler formula (equation 6.67) for ##R_{abcd}##, ie by lowering the first index.
Most tensor formulas will have coordinate systems in which their component formulas are simple, and in other systems they will be horribly complex. A key challenge in GR is to choose the coordinate system in which the component formulas will be simple and easy(er) to manipulate.
Thank you!
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Back
Top