Coordinates of Planets: An Astronomer's Guide

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter t_n_p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Planets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the coordinate systems used to denote the locations of planets and the Moon, particularly in relation to the celestial coordinate system commonly used for stars and galaxies. Participants explore the conventions and challenges of tracking celestial bodies that are in motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • A novice astronomer inquires about the conventions for denoting the locations of planets and the Moon, questioning the applicability of celestial coordinate systems given their continuous movement.
  • One participant clarifies that the "13h 23.7m" notation is not a coordinate system but rather a representation of angles in a time-based format used by astronomers.
  • Another participant explains that there are multiple celestial coordinate systems, which are essentially spherical coordinates, and emphasizes the importance of choosing a reference plane and line.
  • A later reply suggests that observations of quasars can be used to define a reference system for planets, with algorithms converting this to a system centered on the Sun's barycenter.
  • Participants discuss the reliability of online resources for determining the right ascension of planets, with one participant expressing confidence in a specific website.
  • Another participant mentions the JPL site as a resource for generating coordinates of planets in various coordinate systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the existence of multiple coordinate systems and the complexity involved in tracking moving celestial bodies. However, there is no consensus on the best method or system for denoting the locations of planets and the Moon.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of existing coordinate systems and the challenges posed by the motion of celestial bodies, but does not resolve the specifics of which system is most appropriate for planets and the Moon.

Who May Find This Useful

Novice astronomers, students of astronomy, and individuals interested in celestial navigation may find this discussion relevant.

t_n_p
Messages
593
Reaction score
0
Hi, a novice astronomer here.

Was just looking at some stars/galaxies/planets the other day, and followed up some observations by looking at their locations (on wikipedia).

I noticed that for stars/galaxies there are a range of different coordinate/location systems used, although the celestial coordinate system seems the most common (e.g. 13h 23.7m xxs etc).

My question is thus, what is the convention for denoting the location/coordinates of planets/the moon? Since they are continuously moving, as are we on Earth, is there a dedicated system to describe their location?

Also as an aside, does the same happen with galaxies/stars? Because they are further away does their coordinate location change but by smaller magnitudes? Basically why can't the celestial coordinate system be used to locate planets/the moon?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
t_n_p said:
I noticed that for stars/galaxies there are a range of different coordinate/location systems used, although the celestial coordinate system seems the most common (e.g. 13h 23.7m xxs etc).
That "13h 23.7m xxs" business is not a coordinate system. It is just the goofy way astronomers represent angle. Instead of a circle being 360 degrees it is 24 hours to astronomers. A minute in this scale is 1/60 of an hour, or 1/4 degree. A second is 1/60 of a minute, or 1/240 degrees, or 1/4 arc seconds.

There are many celestial coordinate systems. Astronomical coordinates are essentially spherical coordinates. Latitude, longitude, altitude are essentially spherical coordinates, for example. Such systems use a directed reference plane and a directed reference line on the plane (the Earth's equator and the intersection of the Greenwich meridian and the equator in case of latitude and longitude). The latitude (or its equivalent) of some point is the angle between the reference plane and the line from the origin to the point; the sign denotes whether the point is above or below the plane. The longitude (or its equivalent) is the angle between some reference line on the plane and the line from the origin to the projection of the point onto the plane.

So it all comes down to choosing an origin, a directed reference plane, and a directed reference line on the reference plane. There are an infinite number of choices. The most commonly used reference planes are the Earth's equator, The Earth's orbital plane, and the galactic plane.
 
thanks for the reply.
that helps to clear up that part of the question, but what now of the planets/earth's moon?
 
t_n_p said:
thanks for the reply.
that helps to clear up that part of the question, but what now of the planets/earth's moon?

If you want the gory details...

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/publications/docs/Circular_179.pdf

What you do is to use observations to distance quasars to define a basic reference system, and then use some algorithms to convert that system to one in which the sun's barycenter is in the middle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for the reply.
I found this website: http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar
it claims to tell you the right ascension of the planets at any given date you plug in.

Would you say something like this is reliable?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K