How Do Vacuum Energy and the Cosmological Constant Influence Universe Expansion?

Click For Summary
Vacuum energy refers to the energy present in empty space due to quantum fluctuations, which is linked to the cosmological constant (Λ) in Einstein's equations that describe the universe's expansion. The cosmological constant acts as a 'fudge' factor to reconcile theoretical predictions with observational data regarding the universe's accelerating expansion. Theoretical models suggest that vacuum energy, arising from quantum field theory, contributes to Λ, but the calculated value of vacuum energy is vastly higher than the measured cosmological constant, presenting a significant challenge in theoretical physics. This discrepancy highlights the complexities of understanding the fundamental nature of vacuum energy and its role in cosmic expansion. Overall, the interplay between vacuum energy, the cosmological constant, and universe expansion remains an open question in physics.
NYSportsguy
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I am new to the world of theoretical physics and was wondering if anyone can explain "vacuum energy" to me? What does it have to do with the expansion of our universe? Something about a "cosmological constant" is also involved.

If someone can give me a concise and accurate version of what all these three terms have to do with each other it would be much appreciated. I know "virtual particles" also have something to do with this.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hey NYSportsguy.

The solution to Einsteins equations require a 'fudge' factor to account for the current expansion of the universe. This is the cosmological constant \Lambda. We do not really know 'what' \Lambda is, merely that it is required to fit theory with observation.

A number of theories exist as to the fundamental physical nature of \Lambda. One model is that it is the quantum vacuum energy as you mentioned. Here's the main idea. Forget everything you think you know about what an atom is, or an electron, or light or anything like that. In the language of Quantum Field Theory (QFT), one of the most successful theories of physics, ALL matter and energy is fundamentally an excitation of a quantum field which is modeled as a HARMONIC OSCILLATOR. The harmonic oscillator is ubiquitous, ie it exists at all points in space. According to quantum mechanics no oscillator can be at rest due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. This implies that all the oscillator's in the universe are vibrating with some 'zero point' energy with a potentially infinite number of degrees of freedom (meaning each oscillator can vibrate at frequencies ranging from zero to infinity). When you calculate the energy of these vibrations one acquires the so called 'vacuum energy'.

To avoid infinite answers one usually applies some cutoff to the energy integral - around 100 GeV which is an expression of our 'faith' in QFT up to this energy. Even after applying this cutoff one obtains a vacuum energy around 10^{120} larger than the experimentally 'measured' value of the Cosmological constant \Lambda. This is a problem... : ) . It has been called the worst prediction of theoretical physics.

There are ways to tackle this but this is probably too much detail already. Hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 153 ·
6
Replies
153
Views
13K