How Do Einstein's and Modern Cosmological Constants Differ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between Einstein's cosmological constant and the modern interpretation used in cosmological models for dark energy. Einstein's original constant was designed to create a static universe, while the current cosmological constant reflects a small positive value that accelerates the universe's expansion. The key distinction lies in magnitude; the present value exceeds Einstein's original postulation, which was intended to balance gravitational contraction. Empirical measurements of the cosmological constant involve assessing the current expansion rate and gravitational forces to determine whether the universe will decelerate or continue to accelerate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological models and dark energy
  • Familiarity with Einstein's theory of general relativity
  • Knowledge of empirical measurement techniques in cosmology
  • Basic grasp of gravitational dynamics and cosmic expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of dark energy on cosmic expansion
  • Study the methods for measuring the cosmological constant
  • Explore the role of supernova data in cosmological models
  • Investigate the effects of varying cosmological constant values on universe dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology interested in the evolution of the universe and the fundamental forces at play in cosmic expansion.

LSulayman
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Since the discovery of an accelerating expansion in the late 1990s, the cosmological constant has been included in cosmological models for dark energy.

Einstein included the cosmological constant to make the universe static. Dark energy makes the universe expand accelerating. So in the 2 models the cosmological constant explains 2 different things. How is that possible?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The difference between Einstein's cosmological constant and the present one is simply one of magnitude. Einstein chose the cosmological constant to be precisely the right number that he believed would balance out the contracting tendency of a gravitationally dominated universe. When we remove the restriction that the cosmological constant must have that value to make the universe stationary, we can emprically measure what it is and indeed we find a small positive number which is larger than what Einstein had originally postulated (that is, instead of simply balancing the contraction, it actually overpowers the contraction and accelerates the expansion).
 
Nabeshin said:
The difference between Einstein's cosmological constant and the present one is simply one of magnitude. Einstein chose the cosmological constant to be precisely the right number that he believed would balance out the contracting tendency of a gravitationally dominated universe. When we remove the restriction that the cosmological constant must have that value to make the universe stationary, we can emprically measure what it is and indeed we find a small positive number which is larger than what Einstein had originally postulated (that is, instead of simply balancing the contraction, it actually overpowers the contraction and accelerates the expansion).

So, when we refer to a "positive" cosmological constant, this means it is greater than Einstein's original value, where a value smaller than Einstein's would be considered negative?

And, this may seem like a novel question, but when we empirically measure the cosmological constant, what is actually measured?Is calculating the cosmological constant, on a basic level, taking the current expansion rate and figuring the gravitational attraction of everything and seeing if the expansion will decelerate with gravity or if it will speed up?And another question, if anyone can answer it. If we assume the current rate of expansion--ignoring the supernova data--what value for the cosmological constant would we need to have the universe eventually stop expanding and contract?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K