Undergrad Cosmological Constant: Expanding Universe & Data Contradiction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the cosmological constant and its relationship with the expanding universe. Participants clarify that the universe's expansion, driven by dark energy, does not inherently contradict the existence of a cosmological constant. Dark matter contributes to deceleration, while dark energy is responsible for the acceleration of expansion. The cosmological constant, introduced by Einstein for a static universe, can coexist with an expanding universe under specific conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological concepts such as dark matter and dark energy
  • Familiarity with Einstein's cosmological constant and its historical context
  • Knowledge of the implications of redshift measurements in cosmology
  • Basic grasp of energy tensor derivatives in general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of dark energy in cosmic acceleration
  • Study Einstein's cosmological constant and its implications for modern cosmology
  • Explore the differences between dark matter and dark energy
  • Learn about the mathematical framework of energy tensors in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology who seek to understand the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the roles of dark matter and dark energy.

mertcan
Messages
343
Reaction score
6
hi, I have been watching some "world science festival" videos on youtube, also there were a conversation pertain to whether or not the cosmological constant should be a constant. As far as I know, our universe is expanding with a positive acceleration measuring the red shifts, and it implies that net total energy should not be constant in a given time. Nevertheless, there was a situation that a guy in videos said that data they had acquired resembled the cosmological constant. Is not there a contradiction??. Because they say both the our universe is expanding and data they had acquired resembled the cosmological constant (static universe, net total energy is constant).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, there isn't a contradiction. The universe could be expanding without a cosmological constant whatsoever.
Presence of dark matter causes the expansion to accelerate, and if it's in the form of a cosmological constant, this acceleration is constant.
Models with changing dark matter result in acceleration of acceleration of the expansion.
 
Bandersnatch said:
No, there isn't a contradiction. The universe could be expanding without a cosmological constant whatsoever.
Presence of dark matter causes the expansion to accelerate, and if it's in the form of a cosmological constant, this acceleration is constant.
Models with changing dark matter result in acceleration of acceleration of the expansion.
I would like to add that as far as I know we add cosmological constant to ensure the derivative of energy tensor equals zero. I mean, if cosmological constant (even if the dark matter result in it) is constant, then Does not the derivative of energy tensor equal zero? ( static universe )
 
Bandersnatch said:
Presence of dark matter causes the expansion to accelerate

No, the presence of dark energy causes acceleration. Dark matter is a regular matter component which causes deceleration. Dark matter and dark energy are very different concepts.

mertcan said:
Because they say both the our universe is expanding and data they had acquired resembled the cosmological constant (static universe, net total energy is constant).

Einstein's introduction of the cosmological constant was to get a static universe. However, this only occurs for a very particular value for the cosmological constant and the solution is anyway unstable. There is no contradiction in having a cosmological constant and an expanding universe.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Orodruin said:
No, the presence of dark energy causes acceleration
A slip of mind. An embarrassing one nonetheless.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K