Well, when they say that the cosmos expanded from subatomic scales to astronomical scale, I guess that mean you can start from practically zero to, what, say 300,000 lightyears in, what, 1 second at most? Or are there other upper bounds on this?Mike2 said:The newly release WMAP data supports the Inflation model that the universe expanded from subatomic scales to Astronomic scales in a fraction of a second. If so, then what would have been the distance from each point where space would have been expanding at the speed of light, approximately? Thanks.
The cosmological event horizon during inflation refers to the boundary beyond which we cannot observe or receive information from due to the rapid expansion of the universe during the inflationary period.
The cosmological event horizon is closely related to the Big Bang theory as it is a consequence of the rapid expansion of the universe that is predicted by the theory. It is believed that the universe expanded faster than the speed of light during the inflationary period, leading to the formation of the cosmological event horizon.
No, we cannot observe the cosmological event horizon during inflation because it is beyond our observable universe. This means that the light or information from objects beyond this boundary will never reach us, making it impossible for us to observe them.
The cosmological event horizon plays a crucial role in our understanding of the early universe. It helps explain why the universe appears to be homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale, as objects beyond the event horizon are not observable. It also supports the idea of cosmic inflation, which is believed to have smoothed out any irregularities in the early universe.
No, the cosmological event horizon is not a fixed boundary. As the universe continues to expand, the event horizon also moves further away from us. This means that objects that were previously beyond the event horizon may eventually become observable in the future.