Could an Infinite Matrix Redefine Our Understanding of Existence?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shunyadragon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the philosophical concept of an Infinite Matrix (IM) as a framework for understanding existence beyond the Standard Model. The IM is described as an unquantized, infinite, and eternal matrix where all physical entities, including matter and energy, reside. Participants draw parallels between the IM and lattice simulations in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), emphasizing that while finite lattices are used for calculations, the true physical answers emerge as the lattice approaches infinity. The conversation also references quantum field theory (QFT) and its relationship to matrix mechanics, highlighting the evolution of these concepts in theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Knowledge of lattice simulations in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Conceptual grasp of matrix mechanics and its historical context
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of infinite matrices in theoretical physics
  • Explore lattice QCD simulations and their applications
  • Study the foundational principles of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Investigate the historical development of matrix mechanics in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in advanced theoretical frameworks that explore the nature of existence and the mathematical structures underlying physical reality.

shunyadragon
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I thought I started a thread on this topic, but than I could not find it when I looked later, so here goes again. I apologize if this is a duplicate.

I have been fascinated with the concept of infinity since I was in elementary school and my questions frustrated my teachers.

I would like to present the philosophical concept for existence beyond the Standard Model of an Infinite Matrix (IM) for comments and feedback. The IM is unquantisized infinite and eternal matrix that everything physical exists, ie matter energy, singularities, or whatever. The IM may have more dimensions, but for simplicity I will propose a four dimensional IM. Would this concept be useful for a computer model of possible existences.

Has anyone else presented this concept in one way or another?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shunyadragon said:
I thought I started a thread on this topic, but than I could not find it when I looked later, so here goes again. I apologize if this is a duplicate.

I have been fascinated with the concept of infinity since I was in elementary school and my questions frustrated my teachers.

I would like to present the philosophical concept for existence beyond the Standard Model of an Infinite Matrix (IM) for comments and feedback. The IM is unquantisized infinite and eternal matrix that everything physical exists, ie matter energy, singularities, or whatever. The IM may have more dimensions, but for simplicity I will propose a four dimensional IM. Would this concept be useful for a computer model of possible existences.

Has anyone else presented this concept in one way or another?

Sounds like a lattice to me. People to lattice simulations of QCD on computers. Obviously to do calculations you use a finite lattice but these calculations just give you approximations. Once you take the limit that the lattice is infinite by both making the lattice spacing to zero and taking the size of the lattice to infinity then the answer should approach the physical one.

More generally in quantum field theory every point is space is a degree of freedom. In the functional form of QFT you generalise the idea of a finite matrix to a kind of infinite matrix where the sum that appears in a normal matrix multiplication becomes an integral over all of space and time. But in continuum formalisms of QFT one uses differential operators instead of matrices.

Also the Heisenberg first formulated quantum mechanics as "matrix mechanics". He didn't even know about matrices when he first did the work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
13K