Could many worlds be a solution to time travel paradoxes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of many worlds as a potential solution to time travel paradoxes, particularly in the context of hypothetical future time travel to the past. Participants explore the implications of many worlds theory on the nature of time travel and its associated paradoxes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if time travel to the past were possible, the arrival of a time traveler could create a many worlds split, allowing events in the new timeline to occur without affecting the original timeline.
  • Another participant challenges the speculative nature of this idea, questioning its scientific validity and the feasibility of testing such a hypothesis.
  • A different participant clarifies that their intention is not to propose a definitive solution but to explore the many worlds conjecture as a speculative framework for understanding time travel paradoxes, such as the grandfather paradox.
  • It is noted that many worlds is an interpretation of quantum field theory, and there is currently no evidence that information can pass between these worlds, which raises further questions about the nature of these splits.
  • One participant emphasizes that cutting the causal chain opens up many possibilities, but whether these possibilities are realizable remains an open question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and scientific grounding of the many worlds interpretation in relation to time travel. There is no consensus on whether this framework effectively addresses time travel paradoxes.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the many worlds interpretation, the lack of empirical evidence for interactions between worlds, and the unresolved status of time travel paradoxes in theoretical physics.

bland
Messages
150
Reaction score
44
TL;DR
Time travel to the past appears impossible due to the inevitable paradoxes. However while contemplating whether many worlds was in fact metaphysics, it may be a solution to the paradoxes.
And also an answer to 'where are the future time travellers?'. Let's say hypothetically that in the future time travel into the past is invented. To me many worlds looks like metaphysics, but it appears to be taken seriously by physicists, therefore, what if after traveling backwards in time as the traveller arrives could we postulate that his arrival creates a many worlds split so that person is now in that timeline so whatever happens does not affect the timeline whence he came?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems to be a highly speculative solution to a non-problem. It also appears not to be science. How would you test this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Please do not misunderstand. I'm not offering a solution to any problem, I was just looking for some way to make sense of the Many Worlds, conjecture. I mean is that science? I know the math is, but if we are allowed to accept an infinity of infinities of variations of the same universe that somehow exist in a way that we can never come into contact or interact with, then I thought it would be OK to take it seriously and offer it as a speculative solution to backwards time travel that would solve the problem of killing your grandfather.

I mean it seems to be OK to postulate there there is some unknown built in thing that stops these paradoxes, which also is beyond testing.
 
bland said:
I was just looking for some way to make sense of the Many Worlds, conjecture.
This will require to study quantum field theory. It is only an interpretation of the results in that field. Up to now there is no evidence at all that any information could pass between the worlds. I suggest to read in our neighbour forum https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/quantum-interpretations-and-foundations.292/.

There is not really a way to answer your question, except: If you cut the causal chain, anything is thinkable. Whether it's possible is another problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 174 ·
6
Replies
174
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 119 ·
4
Replies
119
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K