Could Planets Exist in Intergalactic Space?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alltimegreat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Planets can exist in intergalactic space, but they are never completely free from gravitational influence. An isolated planet may be far enough from other matter that it is not gravitationally bound to any nearby objects. This occurs when the net gravitational force from surrounding matter cannot overcome the universe's expansion, or when the planet's velocity exceeds the escape velocity relative to nearby mass. Additionally, the gravitational acceleration towards nearby matter may be less than the universe's expansion rate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and their effects in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with concepts of escape velocity and relative velocity
  • Basic knowledge of the expansion of the universe
  • Awareness of black hole dynamics and their influence on surrounding matter
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gravitational dynamics in astrophysics
  • Study the concept of escape velocity in various celestial contexts
  • Explore the implications of the universe's expansion on celestial bodies
  • Investigate the role of black holes in galaxy formation and matter ejection
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in gravitational physics and the dynamics of celestial bodies in intergalactic space.

Alltimegreat1
Messages
115
Reaction score
5
I've seen a number of people write about planets getting ejected from their galaxies as a result of a gravitational sling caused by a black hole. Is this a real thing? I'm having a hard time understanding how gravity in galaxies works. Could a planet in interglactic space be so far out there that it is not affected by any gravitational pull?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Alltimegreat1 said:
Could a planet in interglactic space be so far out there that it is not affected by any gravitational pull?
Hi Alltimegreat:

I am not an expert, but I will make a try at answering your question.

Nothing "is not affected by any gravitational pull". However, some matter, e.g., an isolated planet, may be sufficiently far away from other relatively nearby matter so that it is not gravitationally bound to any other matter.

One interpretation of this is that the net gravitational force from all other relatively nearby matter cannot accelerate the planet towards the other matter to a greater velocity that the expansion of the universe moves the planet away from the other matter.

A second interpretation is that the velocity of the planet relative to the center of mass of all the other relatively nearby matter is greater than the escape velocity at the planet's distance from the center of mass of the other matter.

A third interpretation is that the net gravitational acceleration of the planet towards the center of mass of relatively nearby matter is less than the acceleration of the universe relative to the vector between the planet and the center of mass of the other matter.

I am curious to see what others might answer.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sei and phinds
Buzz, I think that's a good set of scenarios.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K