Counting cycles in a permutation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that for two permutations f and g in the symmetric group Sn, the number of disjoint cycles in the product fg is equal to the number of disjoint cycles in gf. This conclusion is supported by the bijective nature of permutations, which ensures that both fg and gf fix the same number of elements. The participants also note that this property generalizes to a 1:1 mapping between disjoint cycles in fg and gf, reinforcing the established relationship between these permutations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of permutations in symmetric groups (Sn)
  • Knowledge of disjoint cycles in permutation theory
  • Familiarity with bijections and their properties
  • Basic concepts of function composition in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric groups, specifically Sn
  • Learn about cycle decomposition in permutations
  • Explore the concept of bijections in more depth
  • Investigate the implications of function composition on fixed points
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of permutations and their applications in combinatorial theory.

samkolb
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to show that for two permutations f ang g in Sn, the number of disjoint cycles in fg is the same as the number of disjoint cycles in gf. I know that in general fg does not equal gf, but by working examples it seems like they always decompose into the same number of disjoint cycles. Is this even true? Can anyone find a counterexample?

I solved the related problem of showing that fg and gf both fix the same number of elements. This is true because fg fixes x if and only if gf fixes g(x), and g is a bijection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops -- I posted a full solution here and then realized ... this is a homework problem, isn't it? At least it sure sounds like one.

So here's a piece of a solution. Should get you started!

samkolb said:
I solved the related problem of showing that fg and gf both fix the same number of elements. This is true because fg fixes x if and only if gf fixes g(x), and g is a bijection.

It seems like your 1:1 mapping between fixed points in fg and gf generalizes to a 1:1 mapping between disjoint cycles, too. In particular, note that

<br /> (f \circ g)^n = f \circ g \circ f \circ ... \circ g<br />

while

<br /> (g \circ f)^n = g \circ f \circ g \circ ... \circ f<br />

So, if (fg)n carries x to itself, where does (gf)n carry g(x)?

'Nuff said.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K