Counting multiplicities of a particle lattice

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the multiplicities of particle configurations in a lattice system as described in "Molecular Driving Forces, 2nd Ed." The configurations for two states, A and B, are derived using combinatorial formulas, leading to the conclusion that the ratio of multiplicities is given by \(\frac{W_{a}}{W_{b}} = \frac{1}{2^{2n}}\). The analysis further explores a simpler model, state C, and reveals that for sufficiently large N, \({{N}\choose{n}}^{2} = {{2N}\choose{2n}}\) does not hold, indicating a miscalculation in the multiplicity counts. The discussion emphasizes the need for a more accurate approximation of factorials, particularly incorporating the \(\sqrt{2\pi n}\) term.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial mathematics, specifically binomial coefficients.
  • Familiarity with Stirling's approximation for factorials.
  • Basic knowledge of statistical mechanics and entropy concepts.
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and limits.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced applications of Stirling's approximation in statistical mechanics.
  • Explore combinatorial proofs and their implications in physical systems.
  • Learn about the implications of entropy in multi-particle systems.
  • Investigate the role of asymptotic analysis in combinatorial mathematics.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in statistical mechanics, physicists analyzing particle systems, and mathematicians interested in combinatorial analysis will benefit from this discussion.

E'lir Kramer
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
This is from Molecular Driving Forces, 2nd Ed.

5.3: Calculating the entropy of mixing. Consider a lattice with N sites and n green particles, and another lattice with M sites and m red particles. These lattices cannot exchange particles. This is state A.

(a) What is the total number of configurations, [itex]W_{a}[/itex] of the system in state A?

[itex]{{N}\choose{n}}{{M}\choose{m}}[/itex]

(b) Now assume that all of the N+M sites are available to all the green and red particles. The particles remain distinguishable by their color. This is state B. What is the total configurations [itex]W_{b}[/itex] of the system?

I'm counting it like this: we have three species: red balls, green balls, and empty spaces, with a population of n, m, and (N+M-n-m) respectively. There are N+M total sites, so we have

[itex]\frac{(N+M)!}{n!m!(N+M-n-m)!}[/itex]

Now take N =M and n =m for the following two problems:
(c) Using Stirling's approximation, what is the ratio of [itex]\frac{W_{a}}{W_{b}}[/itex]?

For [itex]W_{a} = {{N}\choose{n}}{{N}\choose{n}} \\<br /> = \left(\frac{N!}{n!(N-n)!}\right)^{2} \\<br /> ≈ \left(\frac{\left(\frac{N}{e}\right)^{N}}{\left( \frac{n}{e}\right)^{n}\left(\frac{N-n}{e}\right)^{(N-n)}}\right)^{2} \\<br /> = \left(\frac{N^{N}}{n^{n} (N-n)^{(N-n)}}\right)^{2} \\<br /> = \frac{N^{2N}}{n^{2n} (N-n)^{2(N-n)}} \\[/itex]

[itex] W_{b} = \frac{(2N)!}{n!n!((2(N-n))!} \\<br /> ≈ \frac{(2N)^{2N}}{n^{2n}(2(N-n))^{2(N-n)}} \\<br /> = \frac{2^{2N}N^{2N}}{2^{2(N-n)}n^{2n}(N-n)^{2(N-n)}} \\<br /> = \frac{2^{2n}N^{2N}}{n^{2n}(N-n)^{2(N-n)}} \\[/itex]

These are the same except for a factor of [itex]2^{2n}[/itex] in the numerator of [itex]W_{b}[/itex], so [itex]\frac{W_{a}}{W_{b}} = \frac{1}{2^{2n}}[/itex]


Now while I was trying to figure out how to count a system of red balls and green balls, I started by trying to count a simpler model: a system of size 2N with 2n indistinguishable balls. I assumed that this system would have a higher multiplicity than two systems of size N with n balls each.

In other words, I assumed that [itex]{{N}\choose{n}}^{2} < {{2N}\choose{2n}}[/itex].

I reasoned that the multiplicity of my new system of 2n indistinguishable balls, call it state C, would be approximated by Sterling's approximation like this:

[itex]W_{c} ≈ \frac{(2N)^{2N}}{(2n)^{2n}(2(N-n))^{2(N-n)}}[/itex]

But after manipulation, I found that:

[itex] W_{c} ≈ \frac{(2N)^{2N}}{(2n)^{2n}(2(N-n))^{2(N-n)}} \\<br /> = \frac{2^{2N}N^{2N}}{2^{2n}2^{2(N-n)}n^{2n}(N-n)^{2(N-n)}} \\<br /> = \frac{N^{2N}}{n^{2n}(N-n)^{2(N-n)}} \\<br /> = W_{a}[/itex]

But since [itex]W_{a} = {{N}\choose{n}}^{2} \\<br /> W_{c} = {{2N}\choose{2n}} \\[/itex]
We have [itex]{{N}\choose{n}}^{2} = {{2N}\choose{2n}}[/itex] for N sufficiently large.

I have confirmed with code that [itex]\frac{lim}{N \to ∞} ({{N}\choose{\frac{N}{2}}}^{2} / {{2N}\choose{N}} ) = 0[/itex], so [itex]{{N}\choose{\frac{N}{2}}}^{2} ≠ {{2N}\choose{N}}[/itex]

This implies that I've miscounted either [itex]W_{a}[/itex] or [itex]W_{c}[/itex] - could someone show me the way?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to use a more accurate approximation for n!. You left out the √(2πn) part.
Suppose we write p = n/N. Then ##{{N}\choose{n}} ≈ \left(p^p\left(1-p\right)^{1-p}\right)^{-N-\frac12} \left(2\pi N\right)^{-\frac12}##
Writing ##r = p^p\left(1-p\right)^{1-p}##, ##{{N}\choose{n}} ≈ r^{-N} \left(2\pi r N\right)^{-\frac12}##
So ##{{N}\choose{n}}^2 ≈ r^{-2N} \left(2\pi r N\right)^{-1}##, ##{{2N}\choose{2n}} ≈ r^{-2N} \left(4\pi r N\right)^{-\frac12}##. The ratio of these is ##\left(\pi r N\right)^{\frac12}##
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K