Counting proof of the addition rule

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proof of the addition rule in set theory, specifically for a system of pairwise disjoint subsets \( \{A_1, A_2, \ldots, A_n\} \) of a finite set \( A \). It establishes that the cardinality of the union of these subsets equals the sum of their individual cardinalities, expressed as \( |A| = \sum_{i=1}^{n}|A_i| \). The proof hinges on the fact that each element in \( A \) belongs to exactly one subset, ensuring no double counting occurs. This contrasts with non-disjoint sets, where elements can be counted multiple times, necessitating adjustments in the formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic set theory concepts, including subsets and unions.
  • Familiarity with cardinality and counting principles in mathematics.
  • Knowledge of the implications of disjoint versus non-disjoint sets.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of set theory, focusing on disjoint and overlapping sets.
  • Learn about the inclusion-exclusion principle for counting elements in overlapping sets.
  • Explore advanced topics in combinatorics, particularly related to counting techniques.
  • Review mathematical proofs and their structures to enhance understanding of logical arguments.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying set theory, educators teaching combinatorics, and anyone interested in understanding foundational concepts in counting and proof techniques.

MI5
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Let $ \left\{A_1, A_2, \cdots , A_n\right\}$ be a system of subsets of a finite set $A$ such that these subsets are pairwise disjoint and their union $A = \cup_{i=1}^{n}A_{i}$. Then

$ |A| = \sum_{i=1}^{n}|A_i|$. (1)

Proof: According to the hypothesis, each $a \in A$ belongs to exactly one of the subsets $A_{i}$, and therefore it counts exactly once on each side of equation 1.Could someone explain the bold bit (what's meant by it counts exactly once on each side of the equation) and why that counts as proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $A_1$ and $A_2$ are not disjoint, then we can't say that $|A_1\cup A_2|=|A_1|+|A_2|$. The right-hand side is greater because the elements from the intersection are counted twice: they are counted both as elements of $A_1$ and as elements of $A_2$. (Therefore, the correct formula is $|A_1\cup A_2|=|A_1|+|A_2|-|A_1\cap A_2|$.)

In contrast, in the statement you wrote each element is counted exactly once in both sides of the equation. It can't happen that some $x\in A_i$ and $x\in A_j$ if $i\ne j$, so $x$ will not be counted both in $|A_i|$ and $|A_j|$.

This fact is obvious to anybody who can count: e.g., the total number of children is the number of boys plus the number of girls. The only reason it is made into a proof is to create a contrast with the case where the sets are not necessarily disjoint and where counting is more complicated.
 
Fantastic explanation. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K