MHB Coupled ODEs from Euler Lagrange eq

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Given \(F = A(x)u_1^{'2} + B(x)u'_1u'_2 + C(x)u_2^{'2}\).
\[
\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_i} - \frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_i'}\right] = 0
\]
From the E-L equations, I found
\begin{align*}
\frac{d}{dx}\left[2Au_1' + Bu_2'\right] &= 0\\
\frac{d}{dx}\left[2Cu_2' + Bu_1'\right] &= 0\\
2Au_1' + Bu_2' &= D\\
2Cu_2' + Bu_1' &= E
\end{align*}

Just a general question. Is this DE going to be extremely difficult to solve or is it relativily trivial?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's going to be relatively trivial. Let $v_{1}=u_{1}'$ and $v_{2}=u_{2}'$. Then it's not actually a DE in the $v_{i}$'s, but just an algebraic equation. This happens because there are no $u_{i}$ terms, but only their derivatives. So you can solve for the $v_{i}$'s using your favorite method, and then at least symbolically integrate the result.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K