Coupled ODEs from Euler Lagrange eq

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) derived from the Euler-Lagrange equations. The equations presented are based on the functional \(F = A(x)u_1^{'2} + B(x)u'_1u'_2 + C(x)u_2^{'2}\) and lead to two key equations: \(2Au_1' + Bu_2' = D\) and \(2Cu_2' + Bu_1' = E\). It is concluded that the problem is not extremely difficult to solve, as the derivatives \(v_{1}=u_{1}'\) and \(v_{2}=u_{2}'\) transform the system into algebraic equations, allowing for straightforward resolution and symbolic integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Familiarity with ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Basic calculus for symbolic integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Learn methods for solving ordinary differential equations
  • Explore algebraic techniques for transforming differential equations
  • Investigate symbolic integration methods in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in solving coupled ordinary differential equations, particularly those applying the Euler-Lagrange framework in their work.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Given \(F = A(x)u_1^{'2} + B(x)u'_1u'_2 + C(x)u_2^{'2}\).
\[
\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_i} - \frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_i'}\right] = 0
\]
From the E-L equations, I found
\begin{align*}
\frac{d}{dx}\left[2Au_1' + Bu_2'\right] &= 0\\
\frac{d}{dx}\left[2Cu_2' + Bu_1'\right] &= 0\\
2Au_1' + Bu_2' &= D\\
2Cu_2' + Bu_1' &= E
\end{align*}

Just a general question. Is this DE going to be extremely difficult to solve or is it relativily trivial?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's going to be relatively trivial. Let $v_{1}=u_{1}'$ and $v_{2}=u_{2}'$. Then it's not actually a DE in the $v_{i}$'s, but just an algebraic equation. This happens because there are no $u_{i}$ terms, but only their derivatives. So you can solve for the $v_{i}$'s using your favorite method, and then at least symbolically integrate the result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K