Covariance Matrices and Standard form

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
Ken Gallock
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi.
I have a question about covariance matrices (CMs) and a standard form.
In Ref. [Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems], it is mentioned that CMs ##M## for two-mode Gaussian states can be symplectic transformed to the standard form ##M_s##:
##
M=
\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
G_1 &C \\
C^\top &G_2
\end{array}
\right]\rightarrow
M_s=\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
nI_2 & C_s \\
C_s^\top &mI_2
\end{array}
\right],
##
where ##C_s=\mathrm{diag}~(c_1, c_2)##.
I want to know whether or not the CMs for four-mode Gaussian states can be transformed to the standard form just like the two-mode case (every ##2\times 2## block matrices are diagonalized). I found an article saying "there does not generally exist a standard form for Gaussian states involving more than two-modes." (Ref. [Se-Wan])
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this still true?Thank you. Yes, it is still true that there does not generally exist a standard form for Gaussian states involving more than two modes. The standard form for two-mode Gaussian states is a special case due to the fact that two-mode states have fewer parameters than four-mode or higher-mode states. As such, it is not possible to transform four-mode or higher-mode Gaussian states into a standard form in the same way as two-mode states.