Covariant derivative of a vector field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating a relationship between the covariant derivative of a product involving the determinant of a metric and a vector field. The context is rooted in differential geometry and the properties of covariant derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the covariant derivative and question the correctness of the equations used, particularly regarding the presence of square roots in the expressions. There is an exploration of whether the connection term should vanish for the equation to hold.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts and clarifying equations. Some participants have identified potential mistakes in the original equations and are working towards a clearer understanding of the relationships involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the formulation of the relevant equations and the assumptions about the properties of the determinant and the metric. Participants are navigating these uncertainties as they work through the problem.

physicus
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that [itex]\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)=\partial_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)[/itex]
where [itex]h[/itex] is the metric and [itex]S^a[/itex] a vector.


Homework Equations


[itex]\nabla_a V^b = \partial_a V^b+\Gamma^b_{ac}V^c[/itex]
[itex]\Gamma^a_{ab} = \frac{1}{2det\;h}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}[/itex]
[itex]\nabla_a\sqrt{-det\;h}[/itex] (is that right??) since [itex]\nabla_a h[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I can't quite figure out how to get the result:
[itex]\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)[/itex]
[itex]=\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h})S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\nabla_a(S^a)[/itex]
[itex]=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\Gamma^a_{ab}S^b[/itex]
[itex]=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\frac{1}{2det\;h}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}S^b[/itex]
[itex]=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\frac{1}{2\sqrt{-det\;h}}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}S^b[/itex]
[itex]=\ldots[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd be interested to find out if someone figures out what's going on here, because to me, it does seem unusual that the connection term must drop out for this to work.
 
Are you sure you have the right equations? I'm not entirely sure, but I don't think there should be square root in the second relevant equation. Also I think the problem would make more sense if one of the square roots was outside the derivative on one of the sides of the original equation.
 
Thank you very much for you help! You are right. There is a mistake in my second relevant equation. It should be: [itex]\Gamma^a_{ab} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{det\;h}}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}[/itex]

Then I get:
[itex]\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)[/itex]
[itex]=\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h})S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\nabla_a(S^a)[/itex]
[itex]=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\Gamma^a_{ab}S^b[/itex]
[itex]= \sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\frac{1}{\sqrt{det\;h}}\partial_b \sqrt{det\;h}\;S^b[/itex]
[itex]=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\partial_b\sqrt{-det\;h}\;S^b[/itex]
[itex]=\partial_a (\sqrt{-det\;h}\;S^a)[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K