Crazy idea: How to destroy the earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Idea
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores hypothetical methods for causing irreversible damage to Earth, including theoretical scenarios involving physics and celestial mechanics. Participants engage in a mix of serious and humorous suggestions, examining the feasibility of various destructive ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that using energy to throw the Earth into space could be possible, referencing the concept of escape velocity.
  • Others argue that the energy required to achieve escape velocity from the Sun would likely destroy the Earth's structural integrity before achieving the goal.
  • A suggestion is made to use a large impact, such as a "Big Gun," to accelerate the Earth, though this is deemed extremely unlikely to succeed.
  • One participant humorously suggests that political actions could lead to destruction, indicating a non-scientific approach.
  • Another idea involves using a small black hole or nudging Jupiter to alter Earth's orbital momentum, potentially causing it to fall into the Sun.
  • Some participants discuss smaller-scale effects, such as changing Earth's rotation speed or reducing its mass by launching materials into space.
  • A later reply mentions the long-term inevitability of the Sun consuming the Earth in about 5 billion years, suggesting a passive approach to destruction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the feasibility of the proposed methods for destroying Earth. Multiple competing ideas and humorous suggestions coexist without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the ideas presented, reliance on hypothetical scenarios, and the lack of concrete scientific methods to achieve the proposed outcomes.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in theoretical physics, celestial mechanics, or speculative discussions about planetary destruction may find this thread engaging.

vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
While wondering whether a hardworking crackpot can do actual irreversible damage and obliterate the earth, I did get an idea from an old book, that says that something thrown at the escape velocity never returns. Hence it may be perfectly possible to use the available energy to throw the Earth itself into space!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah but then you would be littering.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jeff Rosenbury, Thewindyfan, cpscdave and 3 others
vin300 said:
While wondering whether a hardworking crackpot can do actual irreversible damage and obliterate the earth, I did get an idea from an old book, that says that something thrown at the escape velocity never returns. Hence it may be perfectly possible to use the available energy to throw the Earth itself into space!

Nah. Just hit it with a really big baseball bat.
 
The idea of say, blasting the Earth with a 'Big Gun' (This can be any form of impact of course) to accelerate it sufficiently to reach an escape velocity from the Solar gravitational field is extremely unlikely. It would be possible I reckon, to wobble the planet, slow or speed up its angular rotation etc. maybe even push its orbit slightly to somewhat more or less parabolic or a slightly more and definitely can reach slightly smaller orbital radius.
HOWEVER, the energy required to acutally overcome the escaspe velocity from the sun, would be so large that the it would far sooner destroy the structural integrity of the mantle first, then potentially the (already superheated) core which would be (more) free to vent through the ruptured surface and likely rip the planet apart.
 
_PJ_ said:
The idea of say, blasting the Earth with a 'Big Gun' (This can be any form of impact of course) to accelerate it sufficiently to reach an escape velocity from the Solar gravitational field is extremely unlikely. It would be possible I reckon, to wobble the planet, slow or speed up its angular rotation etc. maybe even push its orbit slightly to somewhat more or less parabolic or a slightly more and definitely can reach slightly smaller orbital radius.
HOWEVER, the energy required to acutally overcome the escaspe velocity from the sun, would be so large that the it would far sooner destroy the structural integrity of the mantle first, then potentially the (already superheated) core which would be (more) free to vent through the ruptured surface and likely rip the planet apart.

Dang. I was going to try it.
 
A bunch of crackpots could all vote for Trump for US president... That might work =)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thewindyfan
If you want it completely obliterated I guess the cleanest way to go is figure out how to get it lose orbital momentum and eventually fall into the Sun.
In order do to this though you'll need to have something like a small black hole at your disposal,
(although if you didn't have one handy, maybe nudging Jupiter here and there a bit might do the trick)
 
Last edited:
It is very hard to destroy Earth - even with serious science and a budget of trillions, we could not do it today.

If you want to go for smaller effects:
- you can reduce the mass: launch stuff to space.
- you can change the rotation speed: move stuff to the poles to speed it up, or to the equator to slow it down. Or use the local approach.
rootone said:
If you want it completely obliterated I guess the cleanest way to go is figure out how to get it lose orbital momentum and eventually fall into the Sun.
Hitting Jupiter would be easier. Hitting Mars is even easier, something planet-like would remain but life will certainly end.
Easier, not easy...
 
Use time travel. In about 5 billion years the sun will grow to eat the earth.

Or just wait if you're patient.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K