Creation/Ann operators acting on <x|p>

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LostConjugate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of creation and annihilation operators acting on the state , particularly in the context of quantum field theory and the representation of free field scalars as linear combinations of these operators. The scope includes theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications regarding operator actions and transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of a creation or annihilation operator acting on the state , suggesting that is not a state but rather a number when multiplied by an operator.
  • Another participant emphasizes the context of writing a free field scalar as a linear sum of creation and annihilation operators, seeking to understand the role of these operators in the expression.
  • A further contribution likens the representation of these operators to a functional transform, similar to a Fourier transform, indicating that annihilation operators do not act on anything directly but are subject to transformation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of and the role of creation and annihilation operators, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the nature of states and operators, as well as the mathematical context in which these operators are applied, which remain unresolved.

LostConjugate
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
What does it mean for a creation or annihilation operator to act on the state <x|p>. For example:

[tex]a_p e^{ip \cdot x}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<x|p>
This is not a state. It's just a number. In the second formula you have an operator multiplied by a number.
 
haael said:
This is not a state. It's just a number. In the second formula you have an operator multiplied by a number.

Ok, will try to give it in context.

What does it mean to write a free field scalar as a linear sum of creation and annihilation operators like this?

[tex] <br /> \int \frac{d^3 p}{{(2\pi)}^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}} [ a_p e^{ip \cdot x} + a_p^\dagger e^{-ip \cdot x} ][/tex]

What is the creation / annihilation operator role in this, it ends up acting on the amplitude...

[tex]a = \sqrt{\frac{\omega}{2}}q + \frac{i}{\sqrt{2\omega}}p[/tex]
 
Last edited:
What does it mean to write a free field scalar as a linear sum of creation and annihilation operators like this?
This is a functional transform, much just like the Fourier transform. You have a bunch of creation/annihilation operators that depend on a parameter p. You transform them into another operator set that depends on x.

Annihilation operators here do not "act" on anything. Rather, they are a subject of transformation. The result of the transformation is another operator that may act on something.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
859
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K